Simpler Diffusion (SiD2): 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 with pixel-space diffusion
About
Latent diffusion models have become the popular choice for scaling up diffusion models for high resolution image synthesis. Compared to pixel-space models that are trained end-to-end, latent models are perceived to be more efficient and to produce higher image quality at high resolution. Here we challenge these notions, and show that pixel-space models can be very competitive to latent models both in quality and efficiency, achieving 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 and new SOTA results on ImageNet128, ImageNet256 and Kinetics600. We present a simple recipe for scaling end-to-end pixel-space diffusion models to high resolutions. 1: Use the sigmoid loss-weighting (Kingma & Gao, 2023) with our prescribed hyper-parameters. 2: Use our simplified memory-efficient architecture with fewer skip-connections. 3: Scale the model to favor processing the image at a high resolution with fewer parameters, rather than using more parameters at a lower resolution. Combining these with guidance intervals, we obtain a family of pixel-space diffusion models we call Simpler Diffusion (SiD2).
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 | -- | 815 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (val) | FID1.38 | 427 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 | -- | 359 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (train) | -- | 345 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (val) | FID1.38 | 340 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 512x512 (val) | FID-50K1.48 | 219 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (test) | FID1.37 | 208 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (train val) | FID1.38 | 178 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (train) | FID1.72 | 164 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 512x512 (val) | -- | 97 |