Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains

About

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated significant success in enhancing mathematical reasoning and coding performance of large language models (LLMs), especially when structured reference answers are accessible for verification. However, its extension to broader, less structured domains remains unexplored. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness and scalability of RLVR across diverse real-world domains including medicine, chemistry, psychology, economics, and education, where structured reference answers are typically unavailable. We reveal that binary verification judgments on broad-domain tasks exhibit high consistency across various LLMs provided expert-written reference answers exist. Motivated by this finding, we utilize a generative scoring technique that yields soft, model-based reward signals to overcome limitations posed by binary verifications, especially in free-form, unstructured answer scenarios. We further demonstrate the feasibility of training cross-domain generative reward models using relatively small (7B) LLMs without the need for extensive domain-specific annotation. Through comprehensive experiments, our RLVR framework establishes clear performance gains, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art open-source aligned models such as Qwen2.5-72B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B across domains in free-form settings. Our approach notably enhances the robustness, flexibility, and scalability of RLVR, representing a substantial step towards practical reinforcement learning applications in complex, noisy-label scenarios.

Yi Su, Dian Yu, Linfeng Song, Juntao Li, Haitao Mi, Zhaopeng Tu, Min Zhang, Dong Yu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Verifiable JudgingVerifyBench (full)
Accuracy95
19
Verifiable JudgingVerifyBench Hard
Accuracy82.5
19
LLM Judging AgreementReasoning Agreement Benchmark 500-sample human-annotated
Cohen's Kappa0.91
15
LLM Judging AgreementReasoning Agreement Benchmark 2,500 samples
Parsing Success Rate100
15
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationRLVR Multi-subject
Average FPR (%)0.1
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationGSM8K
Average False Positive Rate0.00e+0
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationMATH
Average FPR0.1
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationAIME 1983–2024
Average False Positive Rate0.00e+0
12
Reasoning Correctness EvaluationNaturalReasoning
Average FPR5.2
12
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update