Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

EventWeave: A Dynamic Framework for Capturing Core and Supporting Events in Dialogue Systems

About

Large language models have improved dialogue systems, but often process conversational turns in isolation, overlooking the event structures that guide natural interactions. Hence we introduce EventWeave, a framework that explicitly models relationships between conversational events to generate more contextually appropriate dialogue responses. EventWeave constructs a dynamic event graph that distinguishes between core events (main goals) and supporting events (interconnected details), employing a multi-head attention mechanism to selectively determine which events are most relevant to the current turn. Unlike summarization or standard graph-based approaches, our method captures three distinct relationship types between events, allowing for more nuanced context modeling. Experiments on three dialogue datasets demonstrate that EventWeave produces more natural and contextually appropriate responses while requiring less computational overhead than models processing the entire dialogue history. Ablation studies confirm improvements stem from better event relationship modeling rather than increased information density. Our approach effectively balances comprehensive context understanding with generating concise responses, maintaining strong performance across various dialogue lengths through targeted optimization techniques.

Zhengyi Zhao, Shubo Zhang, Yiming Du, Bin Liang, Baojun Wang, Zhongyang Li, Binyang Li, Kam-Fai Wong• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Dialogue Response GenerationChronicle
B-433.5
38
Dialogue Response GenerationMSC
B-4 Score35.8
38
Response GenerationChronicle and MSC Average
CEA70.3
30
Event Correlation EvaluationChronicle, MSC, and LoCoMo Average
CEA72.8
12
Dialogue Response GenerationLocomo
BLEU-429.1
8
Instruction Following with Long-term MemoryHuman Evaluation 1-10 scale (test)
Coherence8.7
6
Memory-augmented Event Retrieval and Response GenerationChronicle and MSC Average (test)
Memory Precision73
5
Event Consistency EvaluationSHARE
Event Consistency74.4
3
Generation and retrievalMiSC multi-speaker
Coherence76
3
Long-term Memory Retrieval and Response GenerationLongMemEval
Memory Precision68.2
3
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update