Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learning

About

Segmentation and measurement of cardiac chambers is critical in cardiac ultrasound but is laborious and poorly reproducible. Neural networks can assist, but supervised approaches require the same laborious manual annotations. We built a pipeline for self-supervised (no manual labels) segmentation combining computer vision, clinical domain knowledge, and deep learning. We trained on 450 echocardiograms (93,000 images) and tested on 8,393 echocardiograms (4,476,266 images; mean 61 years, 51% female), using the resulting segmentations to calculate biometrics. We also tested against external images from an additional 10,030 patients with available manual tracings of the left ventricle. r2 between clinically measured and pipeline-predicted measurements were similar to reported inter-clinician variation and comparable to supervised learning across several different measurements (r2 0.56-0.84). Average accuracy for detecting abnormal chamber size and function was 0.85 (range 0.71-0.97) compared to clinical measurements. A subset of test echocardiograms (n=553) had corresponding cardiac MRIs, where MRI is the gold standard. Correlation between pipeline and MRI measurements was similar to that between clinical echocardiogram and MRI. Finally, the pipeline accurately segments the left ventricle with an average Dice score of 0.89 (95% CI [0.89]) in the external, manually labeled dataset. Our results demonstrate a manual-label free, clinically valid, and highly scalable method for segmentation from ultrasound, a noisy but globally important imaging modality.

Danielle L. Ferreira, Connor Lau, Zaynaf Salaymang, Rima Arnaout• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) estimationCMR subset
Pearson Correlation (r)0.9
3
Left ventricular (LV) mass estimationCMR subset
Pearson R0.82
3
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimationCMR subset
Pearson Correlation (r)0.8
3
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) estimationCMR subset
Pearson r0.78
3
Left Ventricle SegmentationEchoNet (test)
Dice (Diastole)88.6
2
Left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) estimationSupervised learning literature--
2
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimationSupervised learning literature--
2
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) estimationSupervised learning literature--
2
Left atrial (LA) volume estimationAll-comers (Echo/AI)
r0.92
1
Left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) estimationAll-comers (Echo/AI)
Correlation (r)0.9
1
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Follow for update