Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

FakeShield: Explainable Image Forgery Detection and Localization via Multi-modal Large Language Models

About

The rapid development of generative AI is a double-edged sword, which not only facilitates content creation but also makes image manipulation easier and more difficult to detect. Although current image forgery detection and localization (IFDL) methods are generally effective, they tend to face two challenges: \textbf{1)} black-box nature with unknown detection principle, \textbf{2)} limited generalization across diverse tampering methods (e.g., Photoshop, DeepFake, AIGC-Editing). To address these issues, we propose the explainable IFDL task and design FakeShield, a multi-modal framework capable of evaluating image authenticity, generating tampered region masks, and providing a judgment basis based on pixel-level and image-level tampering clues. Additionally, we leverage GPT-4o to enhance existing IFDL datasets, creating the Multi-Modal Tamper Description dataSet (MMTD-Set) for training FakeShield's tampering analysis capabilities. Meanwhile, we incorporate a Domain Tag-guided Explainable Forgery Detection Module (DTE-FDM) and a Multi-modal Forgery Localization Module (MFLM) to address various types of tamper detection interpretation and achieve forgery localization guided by detailed textual descriptions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FakeShield effectively detects and localizes various tampering techniques, offering an explainable and superior solution compared to previous IFDL methods. The code is available at https://github.com/zhipeixu/FakeShield.

Zhipei Xu, Xuanyu Zhang, Runyi Li, Zecheng Tang, Qing Huang, Jian Zhang• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Tampered Text ClassificationTFR (test)
Accuracy79.1
32
Tampered Text LocalizationTFR (test)
IoU760
32
Fake Image DetectionHPE-Bench 1.0 (Overall)
Accuracy73.82
19
Fake Image DetectionHPE-Bench Text2LIVE 1.0
Acc72.5
19
Tamper LocalizationColumbia
IoU68
16
Tampered Text ClassificationTFR CTM Cross-Method
Accuracy73.6
16
Tampered Text RecognitionTFR (test)
OCR Accuracy24.3
16
Forgery ReasoningTFR CIS Cross-Image-domain
Reasoning Score35.6
16
Forgery ReasoningTFR CTM Cross-Method
Reasoning Score36.2
16
Forgery ReasoningTFR Cross-Language
Avg Reasoning Score42.9
16
Showing 10 of 52 rows

Other info

Follow for update