Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

HalluciNot: Hallucination Detection Through Context and Common Knowledge Verification

About

This paper introduces a comprehensive system for detecting hallucinations in large language model (LLM) outputs in enterprise settings. We present a novel taxonomy of LLM responses specific to hallucination in enterprise applications, categorizing them into context-based, common knowledge, enterprise-specific, and innocuous statements. Our hallucination detection model HDM-2 validates LLM responses with respect to both context and generally known facts (common knowledge). It provides both hallucination scores and word-level annotations, enabling precise identification of problematic content. To evaluate it on context-based and common-knowledge hallucinations, we introduce a new dataset HDMBench. Experimental results demonstrate that HDM-2 out-performs existing approaches across RagTruth, TruthfulQA, and HDMBench datasets. This work addresses the specific challenges of enterprise deployment, including computational efficiency, domain specialization, and fine-grained error identification. Our evaluation dataset, model weights, and inference code are publicly available.

Bibek Paudel, Alexander Lyzhov, Preetam Joshi, Puneet Anand• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination DetectionHaluEvalQA
ROC-AUC0.8385
39
Response-level Hallucination DetectionRAGTruth QA
AUROC87.95
13
Response-level Hallucination DetectionRAGognize
AUROC75.41
13
Response-level Hallucination DetectionHDM-Bench
AUROC69.62
11
Hallucination DetectionHDMBench (test)
HF173.6
10
Token-level hallucination detectionRAGTruth QA
AUROC90.61
7
Token-level hallucination detectionRAGognize
AUROC68.72
7
Token-level hallucination detectionHDM-Bench
AUROC74.99
5
Hallucination DetectionFEVER
Accuracy33.48
3
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update