Explorable INR: An Implicit Neural Representation for Ensemble Simulation Enabling Efficient Spatial and Parameter Exploration
About
With the growing computational power available for high-resolution ensemble simulations in scientific fields such as cosmology and oceanology, storage and computational demands present significant challenges. Current surrogate models fall short in the flexibility of point- or region-based predictions as the entire field reconstruction is required for each parameter setting, hence hindering the efficiency of parameter space exploration. Limitations exist in capturing physical attribute distributions and pinpointing optimal parameter configurations. In this work, we propose Explorable INR, a novel implicit neural representation-based surrogate model, designed to facilitate exploration and allow point-based spatial queries without computing full-scale field data. In addition, to further address computational bottlenecks of spatial exploration, we utilize probabilistic affine forms (PAFs) for uncertainty propagation through Explorable INR to obtain statistical summaries, facilitating various ensemble analysis and visualization tasks that are expensive with existing models. Furthermore, we reformulate the parameter exploration problem as optimization tasks using gradient descent and KL divergence minimization that ensures scalability. We demonstrate that the Explorable INR with the proposed approach for spatial and parameter exploration can significantly reduce computation and memory costs while providing effective ensemble analysis.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conditional Generalization | Nyx (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0464 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | MPAS-Ocean (test) | Rel L2 Error0.0113 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | Cloverleaf3D (test) | Relative L2 Error0.146 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | Nyx low-resolution (x2 reduced) (Unseen Fields) | Rel L2 Error0.0446 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | Nyx Trained Fields low-resolution (x2 reduced) | Relative L2 Error0.0329 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | Cloverleaf3D low-resolution (x2 reduced) (Unseen Fields) | Rel L2 Error0.117 | 4 | |
| Conditional Generalization | Cloverleaf3D low-resolution (x2 reduced) (train) | Relative L2 Error0.0748 | 4 | |
| Super-Resolution | Nyx Unseen Fields (test) | Relative L2 Loss0.0648 | 4 | |
| Super-Resolution | Nyx Trained Fields (train) | Rel L20.0844 | 4 | |
| Super-Resolution | Cloverleaf3D Unseen Fields (test) | Rel L2 Error0.125 | 4 |