Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

NORA: A Small Open-Sourced Generalist Vision Language Action Model for Embodied Tasks

About

Existing Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown promising performance in zero-shot scenarios, demonstrating impressive task execution and reasoning capabilities. However, a significant challenge arises from the limitations of visual encoding, which can result in failures during tasks such as object grasping. Moreover, these models typically suffer from high computational overhead due to their large sizes, often exceeding 7B parameters. While these models excel in reasoning and task planning, the substantial computational overhead they incur makes them impractical for real-time robotic environments, where speed and efficiency are paramount. To address the limitations of existing VLA models, we propose NORA, a 3B-parameter model designed to reduce computational overhead while maintaining strong task performance. NORA adopts the Qwen-2.5-VL-3B multimodal model as its backbone, leveraging its superior visual-semantic understanding to enhance visual reasoning and action grounding. Additionally, our \model{} is trained on 970k real-world robot demonstrations and equipped with the FAST+ tokenizer for efficient action sequence generation. Experimental results demonstrate that NORA outperforms existing large-scale VLA models, achieving better task performance with significantly reduced computational overhead, making it a more practical solution for real-time robotic autonomy.

Chia-Yu Hung, Qi Sun, Pengfei Hong, Amir Zadeh, Chuan Li, U-Xuan Tan, Navonil Majumder, Soujanya Poria• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Object Achievement95.4
957
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate98
527
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO-Plus
Language Understanding Score67
249
Robot ManipulationLIBERO (test)
Average Success Rate87.9
220
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate92
116
Robot ManipulationSimplerEnv WidowX Robot tasks (test)
Success Rate (Spoon)80.2
79
Robot Policy LearningLIBERO
S (Spatial) Rate92.2
73
Robot ManipulationLIBERO simulation
Average Success Rate87.9
73
Robot ManipulationSimplerEnv Google Robot tasks Visual Matching
Pick Coke Can Success Rate86
62
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO (test)
Object Success Rate95.4
58
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update