Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report

About

We introduce Phi-4-reasoning, a 14-billion parameter reasoning model that achieves strong performance on complex reasoning tasks. Trained via supervised fine-tuning of Phi-4 on carefully curated set of "teachable" prompts-selected for the right level of complexity and diversity-and reasoning demonstrations generated using o3-mini, Phi-4-reasoning generates detailed reasoning chains that effectively leverage inference-time compute. We further develop Phi-4-reasoning-plus, a variant enhanced through a short phase of outcome-based reinforcement learning that offers higher performance by generating longer reasoning traces. Across a wide range of reasoning tasks, both models outperform significantly larger open-weight models such as DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B model and approach the performance levels of full DeepSeek-R1 model. Our comprehensive evaluations span benchmarks in math and scientific reasoning, coding, algorithmic problem solving, planning, and spatial understanding. Interestingly, we observe a non-trivial transfer of improvements to general-purpose benchmarks as well. In this report, we provide insights into our training data, our training methodologies, and our evaluations. We show that the benefit of careful data curation for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) extends to reasoning language models, and can be further amplified by reinforcement learning (RL). Finally, our evaluation points to opportunities for improving how we assess the performance and robustness of reasoning models.

Marah Abdin, Sahaj Agarwal, Ahmed Awadallah, Vidhisha Balachandran, Harkirat Behl, Lingjiao Chen, Gustavo de Rosa, Suriya Gunasekar, Mojan Javaheripi, Neel Joshi, Piero Kauffmann, Yash Lara, Caio C\'esar Teodoro Mendes, Arindam Mitra, Besmira Nushi, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, Olli Saarikivi, Shital Shah, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Vibhav Vineet, Yue Wu, Safoora Yousefi, Guoqing Zheng• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME’25, AIME’24, AMC’23, and MATH500 Average (test)
Acc@472.7
66
Author Response GenerationAuthor Response Generation (ARG) dataset
GFP (Supervised)74.8
46
RelevanceALCE
Kendall's Tau0.13
15
RelevanceHotpotQA
Kendall's Tau0.45
15
SummarizationSummEval
Completeness0.27
11
SummarizationOverall Multi-dataset Average
Completeness18
11
CompletenessALCE
Kendall's Tau0.08
11
CompletenessASQA
Kendall's Tau0.13
11
CompletenessQasper
Kendall's Tau-0.02
11
GroundednessCAQA
Kendall's Tau0.01
11
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update