Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning

About

Reward modeling is essential for aligning large language models with human preferences through reinforcement learning from human feedback. To provide accurate reward signals, a reward model (RM) should stimulate deep thinking and conduct interpretable reasoning before assigning a score or a judgment. Inspired by recent advances of long chain-of-thought on reasoning-intensive tasks, we hypothesize and validate that integrating reasoning capabilities into reward modeling significantly enhances RMs interpretability and performance. To this end, we introduce a new class of generative reward models - Reasoning Reward Models (ReasRMs) - which formulate reward modeling as a reasoning task. We propose a reasoning-oriented training pipeline and train a family of ReasRMs, RM-R1. RM-R1 features a chain-of-rubrics (CoR) mechanism - self-generating sample-level chat rubrics or math/code solutions, and evaluating candidate responses against them. The training of RM-R1 consists of two key stages: (1) distillation of high-quality reasoning chains and (2) reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. Empirically, our models achieve state-of-the-art performance across three reward model benchmarks on average, outperforming much larger open-weight models (e.g., INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B) and proprietary ones (e.g., GPT-4o) by up to 4.9%. Beyond final performance, we perform thorough empirical analyses to understand the key ingredients of successful ReasRM training. To facilitate future research, we release six REASRM models along with code and data at https://github.com/RM-R1-UIUC/RM-R1.

Xiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin, Cheng Qian, Yu Wang, Hongru Wang, Yu Zhang, Denghui Zhang, Tong Zhang, Hanghang Tong, Heng Ji• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Reward ModelingRewardBench Focus 2
Accuracy84.6
82
Reward ModelingRewardBench Precise IF 2
Accuracy36.9
70
Reward ModelingRewardBench
Accuracy89
70
Reward ModelingRM-Bench--
53
Reward ModelingAggregate of 7 benchmarks (HelpSteer3, Reward Bench V2, SCAN-HPD, HREF, LitBench, WQ_Arena, WPB)
Overall Accuracy70.37
45
Reward ModelingJudgeBench
Accuracy64.8
45
Reward ModelingJudgeBench (test)
Overall68.6
40
Reward ModelingHelpSteer 3
Accuracy78.18
39
Reward ModelingRM-Bench (test)
Overall Score79.1
39
Reward ModelingRM-Bench Chat Hard
Accuracy83.1
34
Showing 10 of 28 rows

Other info

Follow for update