Reward Reasoning Model
About
Reward models play a critical role in guiding large language models toward outputs that align with human expectations. However, an open challenge remains in effectively utilizing test-time compute to enhance reward model performance. In this work, we introduce Reward Reasoning Models (RRMs), which are specifically designed to execute a deliberate reasoning process before generating final rewards. Through chain-of-thought reasoning, RRMs leverage additional test-time compute for complex queries where appropriate rewards are not immediately apparent. To develop RRMs, we implement a reinforcement learning framework that fosters self-evolved reward reasoning capabilities without requiring explicit reasoning traces as training data. Experimental results demonstrate that RRMs achieve superior performance on reward modeling benchmarks across diverse domains. Notably, we show that RRMs can adaptively exploit test-time compute to further improve reward accuracy. The pretrained reward reasoning models are available at https://huggingface.co/Reward-Reasoning.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reward Modeling | Aggregate of 7 benchmarks (HelpSteer3, Reward Bench V2, SCAN-HPD, HREF, LitBench, WQ_Arena, WPB) | Overall Accuracy70.09 | 45 | |
| Reward Modeling | JudgeBench (test) | Overall75.1 | 40 | |
| Reward Modeling | RM-Bench (test) | Overall Score82.8 | 39 | |
| Reward Modeling | HelpSteer 3 | Accuracy79.42 | 39 | |
| Reward Modeling | PPE Correctness (test) | PPE Corr67.9 | 26 | |
| Reward Modeling | RewardBench (test) | RWBench0.912 | 25 | |
| Reward Modeling | WPB | Accuracy62.83 | 22 | |
| Reward Modeling | HREF | Accuracy72.73 | 22 | |
| Reward Modeling | Reward Bench V2 | Accuracy73.4 | 22 | |
| Reward Modeling | SCAN HPD | Accuracy76.04 | 22 |