Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models
About
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful framework for machine learning interpretability, enabling the unsupervised decomposition of model representations into a dictionary of abstract, human-interpretable concepts. However, we reveal a fundamental limitation: existing SAEs exhibit severe instability, as identical models trained on similar datasets can produce sharply different dictionaries, undermining their reliability as an interpretability tool. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the Archetypal Analysis framework introduced by Cutler & Breiman (1994) and present Archetypal SAEs (A-SAE), wherein dictionary atoms are constrained to the convex hull of data. This geometric anchoring significantly enhances the stability of inferred dictionaries, and their mildly relaxed variants RA-SAEs further match state-of-the-art reconstruction abilities. To rigorously assess dictionary quality learned by SAEs, we introduce two new benchmarks that test (i) plausibility, if dictionaries recover "true" classification directions and (ii) identifiability, if dictionaries disentangle synthetic concept mixtures. Across all evaluations, RA-SAEs consistently yield more structured representations while uncovering novel, semantically meaningful concepts in large-scale vision models.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | DINOv2 ViT-B/14 tokens | LLM Rank5 | 22 | |
| Sparse Autoencoder Concept Alignment | CUB | Sparsity0.994 | 18 | |
| SAE Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | DINOv2 ViT-B 14 Layer 12 activations | LLM Rank3 | 12 | |
| Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | ImageNet 21k ViT-B/16 tokens | LLM Rank2 | 10 | |
| Computational Efficiency | DINOv2 ViT-B/14 (layer 11) | Latency (ms/batch)437.4 | 10 | |
| Dictionary Learning Stability and Geometry Evaluation | DINOv2-B/14 activations (three seeded token datasets) | Cross-Init Similarity86.85 | 9 | |
| SAE Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | DINOv2 ViT-S 14 activations | LLM Rank5 | 6 | |
| SAE Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | SigLIP2-B 16 activations | LLM Rank5 | 6 | |
| SAE Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | ConvNeXt Base activations V2 | LLM Rank5 | 6 | |
| SAE Interpretability and Faithfulness Evaluation | DINOv2 ViT-L/14 activations | LLM Rank2 | 6 |