Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

MINOS: A Multimodal Evaluation Model for Bidirectional Generation Between Image and Text

About

Evaluation is important for multimodal generation tasks, while traditional multimodal evaluation metrics suffer from several limitations. With the rapid progress of MLLMs, there is growing interest in applying MLLMs to build general evaluation systems. However, existing researches often simply collect large-scale evaluation data for training, while overlooking the quality of evaluation data. What's more, current proposed evaluation models often struggle to achieve consistently strong performance across both image-to-text (I2T) and text-to-image (T2I) tasks. In this paper, through rigorous quality control strategies, we construct a comprehensive multimodal evaluation dataset, Minos-57K, with evaluation samples across 15 datasets, for developing the multimodal evaluation model Minos with SFT and preference alignment training strategies. Notably, despite using less than half the scale of the training data of prior work, our model achieves state-of-the-art evaluation performance across 16 out-of-domain datasets covering both I2T and T2I tasks among all open-source multimodal evaluation models and remain competitive with closed-source models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the importance of leveraging quality control process, jointly training on evaluation data from both I2T and T2I generation tasks and further preference alignment.

Junzhe Zhang, Huixuan Zhang, Xinyu Hu, Li Lin, Mingqi Gao, Shi Qiu, Xiaojun Wan• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multimodal Evaluation ConsistencyMLLM-as-a-Judge, RichHF-18K, GenAI-Bench
Average Score42.3
22
Multimodal Evaluation ConsistencyMLLM-as-a-Judge
CO Score32.8
22
Human Consistency EvaluationGenAI-Bench--
16
Text-to-image generation evaluationRichHF-18K
Pearson-r36
13
Human Consistency EvaluationMLLM-as-a-Judge
CO Consistency Score24.9
11
Human Consistency EvaluationRichHF-18K
Kendall's Tau31.5
11
Human feedback evaluation consistencyRichHF-18K
Pearson-r36
11
Generative AI evaluation consistencyGenAI-Bench
Pearson Correlation Score (r)60.2
11
Text-to-image generation evaluationGenAI-Bench
Pearson-r60.2
11
Text-to-Image EvaluationGenAI-Bench--
2
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update