SynthesizeMe! Inducing Persona-Guided Prompts for Personalized Reward Models in LLMs
About
Recent calls for pluralistic alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) encourage adapting models to diverse user preferences. However, most prior work on personalized reward models heavily rely on additional identity information, such as demographic details or a predefined set of preference categories. To this end, we introduce SynthesizeMe, an approach to inducing synthetic user personas from user interactions for personalized reward modeling. SynthesizeMe first generates and verifies reasoning to explain user preferences, then induces synthetic user personas from that reasoning, and finally filters to informative prior user interactions in order to build personalized prompts for a particular user. We show that using SynthesizeMe induced prompts improves personalized LLM-as-a-judge accuracy by 4.4% on Chatbot Arena. Combining SynthesizeMe derived prompts with a reward model achieves top performance on PersonalRewardBench: a new curation of user-stratified interactions with chatbots collected from 854 users of Chatbot Arena and PRISM.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human preference prediction | Chatbot Arena latest (test) | Accuracy72.18 | 51 | |
| Preference Prediction | PRISM (test) | Accuracy64.03 | 51 | |
| Personalized Reward Modeling | PRISM Personalized | Accuracy63.74 | 44 | |
| Personalized Reward Modeling | Chatbot Arena Personalized | Accuracy72.05 | 42 | |
| Personalized Reward Modeling | BESPOKE-Meta OOD | Binary Preference Accuracy54.67 | 18 | |
| Personalized Generation | BESPOKE | R-L8.01 | 18 | |
| LLM-as-a-Judge | PRISM (test) | Accuracy58.9 | 14 | |
| LLM-as-a-Judge | Chatbot Arena (test) | Accuracy66.73 | 14 | |
| Personalized Reward Modeling | PRISM Unseen | User-level Accuracy0.645 | 11 | |
| Personalized Reward Modeling | Reddit TLDR 100 examples Seen | User-level Accuracy68.2 | 11 |