DualDynamics: Synergizing Implicit and Explicit Methods for Robust Irregular Time Series Analysis
About
Real-world time series analysis faces significant challenges when dealing with irregular and incomplete data. While Neural Differential Equation (NDE) based methods have shown promise, they struggle with limited expressiveness, scalability issues, and stability concerns. Conversely, Neural Flows offer stability but falter with irregular data. We introduce 'DualDynamics', a novel framework that synergistically combines NDE-based method and Neural Flow-based method. This approach enhances expressive power while balancing computational demands, addressing critical limitations of existing techniques. We demonstrate DualDynamics' effectiveness across diverse tasks: classification of robustness to dataset shift, irregularly-sampled series analysis, interpolation of missing data, and forecasting with partial observations. Our results show consistent outperformance over state-of-the-art methods, indicating DualDynamics' potential to advance irregular time series analysis significantly.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multivariate Time Series Classification | UEA 30% missing rate (test) | Accuracy72 | 39 | |
| Time-series classification | 18 UEA datasets Regular | Accuracy72.4 | 38 | |
| Time-series classification | UEA 18 datasets 70% Missing | Accuracy69.7 | 34 | |
| Interpolation | PhysioNet Mortality 2012 (test) | Mean Squared Error (MSE)3.114 | 25 | |
| Classification | PhysioNet Sepsis 2019 (test) | AUROC91.8 | 20 | |
| Time-series classification | 18-datasets benchmark suite 70% Missing | Accuracy69.7 | 20 | |
| Time-series classification | 18-datasets benchmark suite Average | Accuracy70.8 | 20 | |
| Time-series classification | 18-datasets benchmark suite 30% Missing | Accuracy72 | 20 | |
| Time-series classification | 18-datasets benchmark suite 50% Missing | Accuracy69.1 | 20 | |
| Time-series classification | 18 UEA datasets 50% Missing | Accuracy69.1 | 18 |