Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Test-time Correlation Alignment

About

Deep neural networks often degrade under distribution shifts. Although domain adaptation offers a solution, privacy constraints often prevent access to source data, making Test-Time Adaptation (TTA, which adapts using only unlabeled test data) increasingly attractive. However, current TTA methods still face practical challenges: (1) a primary focus on instance-wise alignment, overlooking CORrelation ALignment (CORAL) due to missing source correlations; (2) complex backpropagation operations for model updating, resulting in overhead computation and (3) domain forgetting. To address these challenges, we provide a theoretical analysis to investigate the feasibility of Test-time Correlation Alignment (TCA), demonstrating that correlation alignment between high-certainty instances and test instances can enhance test performances with a theoretical guarantee. Based on this, we propose two simple yet effective algorithms: LinearTCA and LinearTCA+. LinearTCA applies a simple linear transformation to achieve both instance and correlation alignment without additional model updates, while LinearTCA+ serves as a plug-and-play module that can easily boost existing TTA methods. Extensive experiments validate our theoretical insights and show that TCA methods significantly outperforms baselines across various tasks, benchmarks and backbones. Notably, LinearTCA achieves higher accuracy with only 4% GPU memory and 0.6% computation time compared to the best TTA baseline. It also outperforms existing methods on CLIP over 1.86%.

Linjing You, Jiabao Lu, Xiayuan Huang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S07 → S19 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score46.76
12
Human Activity RecognitionUSC-HAD source-target pairs
Transfer Accuracy (S01 -> S03)28.04
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S07 → S27 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score61.3
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S05 → S18 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1-score23.47
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S05 → S29 (cross-subject test-time adaptation)
MF1 Score54.36
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S08 → S21 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score61.65
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S08 → S23 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score48.29
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S09 → S19 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score34.39
12
Wearable Human Activity RecognitionUCI-HAR S09 → S30 cross-subject test-time adaptation
MF1 Score18.03
12
Brain Tumor SegmentationBraTS-PED
Dice Score87.43
7
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update