Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

AlphaSteer: Learning Refusal Steering with Principled Null-Space Constraint

About

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, ensuring their ability to refuse malicious prompts, especially jailbreak attacks, is essential for safe and reliable use. Recently, activation steering has emerged as an effective approach for enhancing LLM safety by adding a refusal direction vector to internal activations of LLMs during inference, which will further induce the refusal behaviors of LLMs. However, indiscriminately applying activation steering fundamentally suffers from the trade-off between safety and utility, since the same steering vector can also lead to over-refusal and degraded performance on benign prompts. Although prior efforts, such as vector calibration and conditional steering, have attempted to mitigate this trade-off, their lack of theoretical grounding limits their robustness and effectiveness. To better address the trade-off between safety and utility, we present a theoretically grounded and empirically effective activation steering method called AlphaSteer. Specifically, it considers activation steering as a learnable process with two principled learning objectives: utility preservation and safety enhancement. For utility preservation, it learns to construct a nearly zero vector for steering benign data, with the null-space constraints. For safety enhancement, it learns to construct a refusal direction vector for steering malicious data, with the help of linear regression. Experiments across multiple jailbreak attacks and utility benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of AlphaSteer, which significantly improves the safety of LLMs without compromising general capabilities. Our codes are available at https://github.com/AlphaLab-USTC/AlphaSteer.

Leheng Sheng, Changshuo Shen, Weixiang Zhao, Junfeng Fang, Xiaohao Liu, Zhenkai Liang, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Tat-Seng Chua• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMATH
Accuracy73.4
535
Mathematical ReasoningAIME
AIME Accuracy23.3
283
Science ReasoningGPQA
Accuracy37.9
218
Safety Risk EvaluationS-Eval (Risk)
ASR0.00e+0
72
Over-refusal evaluationNQ (Natural Questions)
ORR0.00e+0
72
Safety-Utility Trade-off EvaluationS-Eval, ORFuzzSet, and NQ Aggregated
F1 Score78.97
72
Over-refusal evaluationORFuzzSet
ORR46
72
Jailbreak Attack EvaluationS-Eval Aattack
Attack Success Rate (ASR)34
72
Harmful Request DefenseAdvBench
ASR0.00e+0
44
Jailbreak DefenseWild Jailbreak
ASR27.7
36
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update