Upweighting Easy Samples in Fine-Tuning Mitigates Forgetting
About
Fine-tuning a pre-trained model on a downstream task often degrades its original capabilities, a phenomenon known as "catastrophic forgetting". This is especially an issue when one does not have access to the data and recipe used to develop the pre-trained model. Under this constraint, most existing methods for mitigating forgetting are inapplicable. To address this challenge, we propose a sample weighting scheme for the fine-tuning data solely based on the pre-trained model's losses. Specifically, we upweight the easy samples on which the pre-trained model's loss is low and vice versa to limit the drift from the pre-trained model. Our approach is orthogonal and yet complementary to existing methods; while such methods mostly operate on parameter or gradient space, we concentrate on the sample space. We theoretically analyze the impact of fine-tuning with our method in a linear setting, showing that it stalls learning in a certain subspace which inhibits overfitting to the target task. We empirically demonstrate the efficacy of our method on both language and vision tasks. As an example, when fine-tuning Gemma 2 2B on MetaMathQA, our method results in only a $0.8\%$ drop in accuracy on GSM8K (another math dataset) compared to standard fine-tuning, while preserving $5.4\%$ more accuracy on the pre-training datasets. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/sanyalsunny111/FLOW_finetuning .
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Science Question Answering | ScienceQA | -- | 791 | |
| Hallucination Detection | HaluEval | -- | 131 | |
| Hallucination Evaluation | HaluEval | -- | 51 | |
| Preservation of General Capabilities | HellaSwag, WinoGrande, IFEval, MMLU | HellaSwag Delta8.4 | 44 | |
| Forgetting-aware Instruction Tuning | Magicoder Stability and Plasticity suites (test) | ARC-C53.2 | 36 | |
| Language Adaptation | Galician | Win-Tie94.5 | 31 | |
| General Knowledge Preservation | General Capability Suite HS WG IFEval MMLU | HS Delta13.5 | 22 | |
| Knowledge Acquisition | TOFU author-profile questions (held-out) | Task Accuracy77.5 | 22 | |
| Hallucination Detection | HaluEval | HaluEval Delta18.8 | 10 | |
| Science Question Answering | Science QA | Task Accuracy58.3 | 10 |