Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty

About

Recent advances in deep learning rely heavily on massive datasets, leading to substantial storage and training costs. Dataset pruning aims to alleviate this demand by discarding redundant examples. However, many existing methods require training a model with a full dataset over a large number of epochs before being able to prune the dataset, which ironically makes the pruning process more expensive than just training the model on the entire dataset. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a Difficulty and Uncertainty-Aware Lightweight (DUAL) score, which aims to identify important samples from the early training stage by considering both example difficulty and prediction uncertainty. To address a catastrophic accuracy drop at an extreme pruning, we further propose a ratio-adaptive sampling using Beta distribution. Experiments on various datasets and learning scenarios such as image classification with label noise and image corruption, and model architecture generalization demonstrate the superiority of our method over previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches. Specifically, on ImageNet-1k, our method reduces the time cost for pruning to 66% compared to previous methods while achieving a SOTA, specifically 60% test accuracy at a 90% pruning ratio. On CIFAR datasets, the time cost is reduced to just 15% while maintaining SOTA performance.

Yeseul Cho, Baekrok Shin, Changmin Kang, Chulhee Yun• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationSUN397 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy60.7
231
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy77.4
204
Image ClassificationFood-101 (test)
Accuracy80.2
145
Image ClassificationImageNet-1K
Top-1 Accuracy75.5
78
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N ResNet-18 (test)
Clean Accuracy95.5
55
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-C 30% corrupted (test)
Accuracy73.6
45
Image ClassificationTiny-ImageNet-C 30% corrupted (test)
Accuracy43.7
45
Image ClassificationCaltech-101 naturally imbalanced (test)
Accuracy79.2
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-LT balanced imbalance factor 0.1 (test)
Accuracy58.1
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 LT IF=0.01 (test)
Accuracy37
45
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update