Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Whoever Started the Interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectors

About

Model merging seeks to integrate task-specific expert models into a unified architecture while preserving multi-task generalization capabilities, yet parameter interference between constituent models frequently induces performance degradation. Although prior work has explored many merging strategies, resolving interference without additional data for retraining or test-time computation remains challenging. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate that the task vectors of the linear layer constitute an approximate linear subspace for its corresponding input. Therefore, we can minimize interference under the guidance of task vectors. Based on this insight, we propose \textbf{WUDI-Merging} (\textbf{W}hoever started the interference sho\textbf{U}ld en\textbf{D} \textbf{I}t), a simple yet effective model merging method that eliminates interference without any additional data or rescaling coefficients. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across vision and language benchmarks demonstrate our method's superiority, achieving state-of-the-art performance in data-free model merging scenarios (average 10.9\% improvement versus baseline methods) while even outperforming mainstream test-time adaptation approaches by 3.3\%, and only very few computing resources are required. The code will be publicly available soon.

Runxi Cheng, Feng Xiong, Yongxian Wei, Wanyun Zhu, Chun Yuan• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy41.39
1525
Image ClassificationDomainNet--
206
Visual Question AnsweringGQA (test)
Accuracy60.11
188
Image Classification20 Vision Classification Tasks
Average Accuracy82.8
94
Chart UnderstandingChartQA (test)
Accuracy74.36
92
Image Classification14 Vision Tasks
Average Accuracy89.9
84
Image Classification8 Vision Tasks (test)
Avg Accuracy55.25
82
Image Classification8-task vision benchmark
Average Accuracy94
64
OCR-related Understanding TasksTextVQA (val)
Accuracy80.78
57
Optical Character RecognitionOCRVQA (test)
OCRVQA Score71.12
38
Showing 10 of 52 rows

Other info

Follow for update