Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CyclicReflex: Improving Reasoning Models via Cyclical Reflection Token Scheduling

About

Large reasoning models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek-R1, harness test-time scaling to perform multi-step reasoning for complex problem-solving. This reasoning process, executed before producing final answers, is often guided by special juncture tokens that prompt self-evaluative reflection. These transition markers and reflective cues are referred to as "reflection tokens" (e.g., "wait", "but", "alternatively"). In this work, we treat reflection tokens as a "resource" and introduce the problem of resource allocation, aimed at improving the test-time compute performance of LRMs by adaptively regulating the frequency and placement of reflection tokens. Through empirical analysis, we show that both excessive and insufficient use of reflection tokens, referred to as over-reflection and under-reflection, can degrade model performance. To better understand this trade-off, we draw an analogy between reflection token usage and learning rate scheduling in optimization. Building on this insight, We propose cyclical reflection token scheduling (termed CyclicReflex), a training-free decoding strategy that dynamically modulates reflection token logits with a bidirectional, position-dependent triangular waveform, incurring no additional computation cost. Experiments on MATH500, AIME2024/2025, AMC2023, GPQA Diamond and LiveCodeBench demonstrate that CyclicReflex consistently improves performance across model sizes (1.5B-14B), outperforming standard decoding and recent approaches such as TIP (thought switching penalty) and S1. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/CyclicReflex.

Chongyu Fan, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Alfred Hero, Sijia Liu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAMC 2023
Accuracy90
124
Code GenerationLiveCodeBench
Accuracy67
60
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy40
59
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Mean@10.9
55
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy89
12
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy53
12
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy37
12
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update