Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Effective Data Pruning through Score Extrapolation

About

Training advanced machine learning models demands massive datasets, resulting in prohibitive computational costs. To address this challenge, data pruning techniques identify and remove redundant training samples while preserving model performance. Yet, existing pruning techniques predominantly require a full initial training pass to identify removable samples, negating any efficiency benefits for single training runs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel importance score extrapolation framework that requires training on only a small subset of data. We present two initial approaches in this framework - k-nearest neighbors and graph neural networks - to accurately predict sample importance for the entire dataset using patterns learned from this minimal subset. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for 2 state-of-the-art pruning methods (Dynamic Uncertainty and TDDS), 4 different datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Places-365, and ImageNet), and 3 training paradigms (supervised, unsupervised, and adversarial). Our results indicate that score extrapolation is a promising direction to scale expensive score calculation methods, such as pruning, data attribution, or other tasks.

Sebastian Schmidt, Prasanga Dhungel, Christoffer L\"offler, Bj\"orn Nieth, Stephan G\"unnemann, Leo Schwinn• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationSUN397 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy58.7
231
Image ClassificationFood-101 (test)
Accuracy76.3
145
Image ClassificationTiny-ImageNet-C 30% corrupted (test)
Accuracy41.3
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-LT balanced imbalance factor 0.1 (test)
Accuracy55.3
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 LT IF=0.01 (test)
Accuracy34.7
45
Image ClassificationCaltech-101 naturally imbalanced (test)
Accuracy73.2
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-C 30% corrupted (test)
Accuracy67.5
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy (k=30)75.5
12
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy (30%)95.3
9
Image ClassificationImageNet 1k (test)
Accuracy (30% Threshold)68.9
9
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update