Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs

About

In multimodal large language models (MLLMs), the length of input visual tokens is often significantly greater than that of their textual counterparts, leading to a high inference cost. Many works aim to address this issue by removing redundant visual tokens. However, current approaches either rely on attention-based pruning, which retains numerous duplicate tokens, or use similarity-based pruning, overlooking the instruction relevance, consequently causing suboptimal performance. In this paper, we go beyond attention or similarity by proposing a novel visual token pruning method named CDPruner, which maximizes the conditional diversity of retained tokens. We first define the conditional similarity between visual tokens conditioned on the instruction, and then reformulate the token pruning problem with determinantal point process (DPP) to maximize the conditional diversity of the selected subset. The proposed CDPruner is training-free and model-agnostic, allowing easy application to various MLLMs. Extensive experiments across diverse MLLMs show that CDPruner establishes new state-of-the-art on various vision-language benchmarks. By maximizing conditional diversity through DPP, the selected subset better represents the input images while closely adhering to user instructions, thereby preserving strong performance even with high reduction ratios. When applied to LLaVA, CDPruner reduces FLOPs by 95\% and CUDA latency by 78\%, while maintaining 94\% of the original accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Theia-4869/CDPruner.

Qizhe Zhang, Mengzhen Liu, Lichen Li, Ming Lu, Yuan Zhang, Junwen Pan, Qi She, Shanghang Zhang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy55.8
1525
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy87.9
1455
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy81.6
1362
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy58.4
1285
Automatic Speech RecognitionLibriSpeech clean (test)
WER4.18
1156
Automatic Speech RecognitionLibriSpeech (test-other)
WER6.53
1151
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy69.1
807
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2 (test-dev)
Overall Accuracy78.4
706
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score1.48e+3
658
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench
Accuracy82.4
637
Showing 10 of 89 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update