Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMs

About

In multimodal large language models (MLLMs), the length of input visual tokens is often significantly greater than that of their textual counterparts, leading to a high inference cost. Many works aim to address this issue by removing redundant visual tokens. However, current approaches either rely on attention-based pruning, which retains numerous duplicate tokens, or use similarity-based pruning, overlooking the instruction relevance, consequently causing suboptimal performance. In this paper, we go beyond attention or similarity by proposing a novel visual token pruning method named CDPruner, which maximizes the conditional diversity of retained tokens. We first define the conditional similarity between visual tokens conditioned on the instruction, and then reformulate the token pruning problem with determinantal point process (DPP) to maximize the conditional diversity of the selected subset. The proposed CDPruner is training-free and model-agnostic, allowing easy application to various MLLMs. Extensive experiments across diverse MLLMs show that CDPruner establishes new state-of-the-art on various vision-language benchmarks. By maximizing conditional diversity through DPP, the selected subset better represents the input images while closely adhering to user instructions, thereby preserving strong performance even with high reduction ratios. When applied to LLaVA, CDPruner reduces FLOPs by 95\% and CUDA latency by 78\%, while maintaining 94\% of the original accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Theia-4869/CDPruner.

Qizhe Zhang, Mengzhen Liu, Lichen Li, Ming Lu, Yuan Zhang, Junwen Pan, Qi She, Shanghang Zhang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy81.6
1165
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy57.3
1117
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy87.9
935
Multimodal EvaluationMME--
557
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy61.3
496
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy61.6
374
Video Question AnsweringMSRVTT-QA (test)
Accuracy30.1
371
Multimodal UnderstandingMMMU
Accuracy42.9
275
Video Question AnsweringMSVD-QA (test)
Accuracy41.9
274
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA IMG
Accuracy72.1
256
Showing 10 of 46 rows

Other info

Follow for update