Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

LLaVA-SP: Enhancing Visual Representation with Visual Spatial Tokens for MLLMs

About

The architecture of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) commonly connects a vision encoder, often based on CLIP-ViT, to a large language model. While CLIP-ViT works well for capturing global image features, it struggles to model local relationships between adjacent patches, leading to weaker visual representation, which in turn affects the detailed understanding ability of MLLMs. To solve this, we propose LLaVA-SP, which only adds six spatial visual tokens to the original visual tokens to enhance the visual representation. Our approach offers three key advantages: 1) We propose a novel Projector, which uses convolutional kernels to derive visual spatial tokens from ViT patch features, simulating two visual spatial ordering approaches: "from central region to global" and "from abstract to specific". Then, a cross-attention mechanism is applied to fuse fine-grained visual information, enriching the overall visual representation. 2) We present two model variants: LLaVA-SP-Cropping, which focuses on detail features through progressive cropping, and LLaVA-SP-Pooling, which captures global semantics through adaptive pooling, enabling the model to handle diverse visual understanding tasks. 3) Extensive experiments show that LLaVA-SP, fine-tuned with LoRA, achieves significant performance improvements across various multimodal benchmarks, outperforming the state-of-the-art LLaVA-1.5 model in multiple tasks with nearly identical inference latency. The code and models are available at https://github.com/CnFaker/LLaVA-SP.

Haoran Lou, Chunxiao Fan, Ziyan Liu, Yuexin Wu, Xinliang Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multimodal EvaluationMM-Vet--
249
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy (POPE)86.6
137
Multi-modal Perception EvaluationMME Perception
Perception Score1.47e+3
43
Multimodal EvaluationLLaVA-Bench-Wild (LLaVA-W)
Overall Score61.7
43
Visual Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQAI)
Accuracy68.4
42
Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
VQAText Score58.5
21
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
VQAv2 Score79.2
16
Multimodal EvaluationSEED-Bench Image
SEEDI Score67.9
7
Image ReconstructionReconstruction Quality under IP-Adapter Attack
PSNR10.57
3
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update