Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Memory-Scalable and Simplified Functional Map Learning

About

Deep functional maps have emerged in recent years as a prominent learning-based framework for non-rigid shape matching problems. While early methods in this domain only focused on learning in the functional domain, the latest techniques have demonstrated that by promoting consistency between functional and pointwise maps leads to significant improvements in accuracy. Unfortunately, existing approaches rely heavily on the computation of large dense matrices arising from soft pointwise maps, which compromises their efficiency and scalability. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel memory-scalable and efficient functional map learning pipeline. By leveraging the specific structure of functional maps, we offer the possibility to achieve identical results without ever storing the pointwise map in memory. Furthermore, based on the same approach, we present a differentiable map refinement layer adapted from an existing axiomatic refinement algorithm. Unlike many functional map learning methods, which use this algorithm at a post-processing step, ours can be easily used at train time, enabling to enforce consistency between the refined and initial versions of the map. Our resulting approach is both simpler, more efficient and more numerically stable, by avoiding differentiation through a linear system, while achieving close to state-of-the-art results in challenging scenarios.

Robin Magnet, Maks Ovsjanikov• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Non-isometric 3D shape matchingSMAL
Mean Geodesic Error7.3
58
Shape MatchingSHREC'19
Geodesic Error (x100)4.2
45
3D shape matchingFAUST Anisotropic (F_a)
Mean Geodesic Error2.2
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE Anisotropic (S_a)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.4
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE S
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.4
35
3D shape matchingFAUST (F)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)1.9
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (×100)2.4
34
3D shape matchingFAUST original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)1.9
34
3D shape matchingSHREC’19 original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error4.2
24
Shape MatchingSMAL remeshed (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)9.9
20
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update