Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Models

About

Trustworthy robot behavior requires not only high levels of task success but also that the robot can reliably quantify how likely it is to succeed. To this end, we present a first-of-its-kind study of confidence calibration in vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models, which map visual observations and natural language instructions to low-level robot motor commands. We establish a confidence baseline for VLAs, examine how task success relates to calibration error and how calibration evolves over time, and introduce two lightweight techniques to remedy the miscalibration we observe: prompt ensembles and action-wise Platt scaling. Our aim in this study is to begin to develop the tools and conceptual understanding necessary to render VLAs both highly performant and highly trustworthy via reliable uncertainty quantification.

Thomas P Zollo, Richard Zemel• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Confidence EstimationVLCB Pooled Aggregate (test)
ECE12.77
48
Failure DetectionLIBERO Unseen
Brier Score0.218
37
Failure DetectionLIBERO seen
Brier Score0.212
37
Large Vision-Language Model EvaluationUnweighted Average
ECE31.9
29
Vision-Language Question AnsweringPooled Shared (GQA, POPE, LLaVA-Wild, MMMU Pro, GMAI-MMBench, MME-Finance) (test)
Expected Calibration Error (ECE)12.8
22
Failure DetectionWidowX seen
Brier Score0.255
11
Failure DetectionWidowX (unseen)
Brier Score0.257
11
Failure DetectionFranka seen
Brier Score0.29
11
Failure DetectionFranka unseen
Brier Score0.294
11
Confidence EstimationLIBERO Online Execution spatial object goal
ECE0.0276
8
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update