Beyond Model Base Retrieval: Weaving Knowledge to Master Fine-grained Neural Network Design
About
Designing high-performance neural networks for new tasks requires balancing optimization quality with search efficiency. Current methods fail to achieve this balance: neural architectural search is computationally expensive, while model retrieval often yields suboptimal static checkpoints. To resolve this dilemma, we model the performance gains induced by fine-grained architectural modifications as edit-effect evidence and build evidence graphs from prior tasks. By constructing a retrieval-augmented model refinement framework, our proposed M-DESIGN dynamically weaves historical evidence to discover near-optimal modification paths. M-DESIGN features an adaptive retrieval mechanism that quickly calibrates the evolving transferability of edit-effect evidence from different sources. To handle out-of-distribution shifts, we introduce predictive task planners that extrapolate gains from multi-hop evidence, thereby reducing reliance on an exhaustive repository. Based on our model knowledge base of 67,760 graph neural networks across 22 datasets, extensive experiments demonstrate that M-DESIGN consistently outperforms baselines, achieving the search-space best performance in 26 out of 33 cases under a strict budget.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node Classification | Cora | Accuracy88.5 | 885 | |
| Graph Classification | PROTEINS | Accuracy79.73 | 742 | |
| Node Classification | Cora (test) | -- | 687 | |
| Graph Classification | NCI1 | Accuracy79.04 | 460 | |
| Node Classification | Pubmed | Accuracy89.08 | 307 | |
| Node Classification | Citeseer | Accuracy74.59 | 275 | |
| Node Classification | Texas (test) | -- | 228 | |
| Graph Classification | NCI109 | Accuracy78.83 | 223 | |
| Node Classification | Wisconsin (test) | -- | 198 | |
| Node Classification | Cornell (test) | -- | 188 |