Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

AttnTrace: Contextual Attribution of Prompt Injection and Knowledge Corruption

About

Long-context large language models (LLMs), such as Gemini-2.5-Pro and Claude-Sonnet-4, are increasingly used to empower advanced AI systems, including retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines and autonomous agents. In these systems, an LLM receives an instruction along with a context--often consisting of texts retrieved from a knowledge database or memory--and generates a response that is contextually grounded by following the instruction. Recent studies have designed solutions to trace back to a subset of texts in the context that contributes most to the response generated by the LLM. These solutions have numerous real-world applications, including performing post-attack forensic analysis and improving the interpretability and trustworthiness of LLM outputs. While significant efforts have been made, state-of-the-art solutions such as TracLLM often lead to a high computation cost, e.g., it takes TracLLM hundreds of seconds to perform traceback for a single response-context pair. In this work, we propose AttnTrace, a new context traceback method based on the attention weights produced by an LLM for a prompt. To effectively utilize attention weights, we introduce two techniques designed to enhance the effectiveness of AttnTrace, and we provide theoretical insights for our design choice. We also perform a systematic evaluation for AttnTrace. The results demonstrate that AttnTrace is more accurate and efficient than existing state-of-the-art context traceback methods. We also show that AttnTrace can improve state-of-the-art methods in detecting prompt injection under long contexts through the attribution-before-detection paradigm. As a real-world application, we demonstrate that AttnTrace can effectively pinpoint injected instructions in a paper designed to manipulate LLM-generated reviews. The code is at https://github.com/Wang-Yanting/AttnTrace.

Yanting Wang, Runpeng Geng, Ying Chen, Jinyuan Jia• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Knowledge corruption tracebackNQ
Precision98
30
Knowledge corruption tracebackMS Marco
Precision95
26
Traceback (Prompt Injection Attacks)MuSiQue
Precision (MuSiQue Traceback)99
23
Knowledge corruption tracebackHotpotQA
Precision95
16
Traceback (Prompt Injection Attacks)NarrativeQA
Precision96
13
Traceback (Prompt Injection Attacks)QMSum
Precision99
13
Prompt Injection Attack TracingMuSiQue
Precision75
12
Context TracebackQMSum LongBench
Precision99
10
Knowledge corruption attackHotpotQA
Precision99
10
Context TracebackNarrativeQA LongBench
Precision96
10
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update