Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning
About
Thanks to the large pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP, we can craft a zero-shot classifier by "prompt", e.g., the confidence score of an image being "[CLASS]" can be obtained by using the VLM provided similarity measure between the image and the prompt sentence "a photo of a [CLASS]". Therefore, prompt shows a great potential for fast adaptation of VLMs to downstream tasks if we fine-tune the prompt-based similarity measure. However, we find a common failure that improper fine-tuning may not only undermine the prompt's inherent prediction for the task-related classes, but also for other classes in the VLM vocabulary. Existing methods still address this problem by using traditional anti-overfitting techniques such as early stopping and data augmentation, which lack a principled solution specific to prompt. We present Prompt-aligned Gradient, dubbed ProGrad, to prevent prompt tuning from forgetting the the general knowledge learned from VLMs. In particular, ProGrad only updates the prompt whose gradient is aligned (or non-conflicting) to the "general direction", which is represented as the gradient of the KL loss of the pre-defined prompt prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the stronger few-shot generalization ability of ProGrad over state-of-the-art prompt tuning methods. Codes are available at https://github.com/BeierZhu/Prompt-align.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet 1k (test) | Top-1 Accuracy72.1 | 848 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet A | Top-1 Acc23.05 | 654 | |
| Image Classification | Stanford Cars | Accuracy82.9 | 635 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet V2 | -- | 611 | |
| Image Classification | EuroSAT | Accuracy43.46 | 569 | |
| Image Classification | Flowers102 | Accuracy95.78 | 558 | |
| Image Classification | Food-101 | Accuracy85.4 | 542 | |
| Image Classification | DTD | Accuracy39.42 | 542 | |
| Image Classification | DTD | Accuracy68.14 | 485 | |
| Image Classification | Food101 | Accuracy85.8 | 457 |