Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Self-Rewarding Vision-Language Model via Reasoning Decomposition

About

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often suffer from visual hallucinations, saying things that are not actually in the image, and language shortcuts, where they skip the visual part and just rely on text priors. These issues arise because most post-training methods for VLMs rely on simple verifiable answer matching and supervise only final outputs, leaving intermediate visual reasoning without explicit guidance. As a result, VLMs receive sparse visual signals and often learn to prioritize language-based reasoning over visual perception. To mitigate this, some existing methods add visual supervision using human annotations or distilled labels from external large models. However, human annotations are labor-intensive and costly, and because external signals cannot adapt to the evolving policy, they cause distributional shifts that can lead to reward hacking. In this paper, we introduce Vision-SR1, a self-rewarding method that improves visual reasoning without relying on external visual supervisions via reinforcement learning. Vision-SR1 decomposes VLM reasoning into two stages: visual perception and language reasoning. The model is first prompted to produce self-contained visual perceptions that are sufficient to answer the question without referring back the input image. To validate this self-containment, the same VLM model is then re-prompted to perform language reasoning using only the generated perception as input to compute reward. This self-reward is combined with supervision on final outputs, providing a balanced training signal that strengthens both visual perception and language reasoning. Our experiments demonstrate that Vision-SR1 improves visual reasoning, mitigates visual hallucinations, and reduces reliance on language shortcuts across diverse vision-language tasks.

Zongxia Li, Wenhao Yu, Chengsong Huang, Rui Liu, Zhenwen Liang, Fuxiao Liu, Jingxi Che, Dian Yu, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningWeMath
Accuracy33.6
75
Mathematical ReasoningMathVerse
Accuracy40.7
39
Visual Logical ReasoningLogicVista
Accuracy43.2
28
Visual ReasoningMMMU Pro Vision
Accuracy38.9
18
Mathematical ReasoningMathVision MVisionm
Accuracy28
18
Mathematical ReasoningDynaMath DMath
Accuracy52.6
18
Mathematical ReasoningMathVista MVistam
Accuracy67
18
HallucinationHallusionBench
Pass@143.2
16
Expert-level multidisciplinary QAMMMU (dev val)
Pass@152.8
13
General-purpose multiple-choice evaluationMMBench EN V11 (dev)
Pass@184.3
13
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update