Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Self-Rewarding Vision-Language Model via Reasoning Decomposition

About

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often suffer from visual hallucinations: generating things that are not consistent with visual inputs and language shortcuts, where they skip the visual part and just rely on text priors. These issues arise because most post training methods for VLMs rely on simple verifiable answer matching and supervise only final outputs, leaving intermediate visual reasoning without explicit guidance. As a result, VLMs receive sparse visual signals and often learn to prioritize language based reasoning over visual perception. We introduce Vision SR1, a three stage self rewarding reinforcement learning method that improves visual reasoning without relying on external visual supervision. Vision SR1 decomposes VLM reasoning into two components: visual reasoning and language reasoning, where the model is first prompted to produce self-contained visual descriptions sufficient to answer the question without referring back to the input image, before jointly optimizing both visual and language reasoning through our multi reward loss objective. To validate this self containment, the same VLM model is reprompted to perform language reasoning using only the generated visual reasoning as input to compute visual reward. The final reward is computed through a decoupled reward-advantage framework, where visual reward and language reasoning reward each have their advantages calculated separately. Our experiments show that Vision SR1 improves visual reasoning, mitigates visual hallucinations, and reduces reliance on language shortcuts across diverse vision language tasks, while being more efficient than methods that rely on external visual reward models, which require additional GPUs to host. In contrast, Vision SR1 introduces no extra GPU overhead beyond that of standard training.

Zongxia Li, Wenhao Yu, Chengsong Huang, Zhenwen Liang, Rui Liu, Fuxiao Liu, Jingxi Che, Dian Yu, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE--
2019
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy35.8
1820
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy70.1
962
Visual Question AnsweringChartQA
Accuracy71.7
519
Visual Question AnsweringScienceQA
Accuracy88
446
Optical Character RecognitionOCRBench
Score449
433
Visual Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
Accuracy72.3
366
Multi-discipline Multimodal UnderstandingMMMU
Accuracy57.2
363
Visual Question AnsweringVQA v2
Accuracy64.7
333
Visual Question AnsweringAI2D
Accuracy69
317
Showing 10 of 65 rows

Other info

Follow for update