Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

M$^2$IV: Towards Efficient and Fine-grained Multimodal In-Context Learning via Representation Engineering

About

Multimodal in-context learning (ICL) equips Large Vision-language Models (LVLMs) with the ability to adapt to new tasks via multiple user-provided demonstrations, without requiring any model parameter updates. However, its effectiveness is constrained by the token-intensive nature of multimodal inputs and the complexity of cross-modal few-shot reasoning, which together hinder LVLMs from extracting useful patterns from demonstrations. To address these challenges, we propose \textbf{M$^2$IV}, a novel representation engineering approach that replaces explicit token-level demonstrations with a set of learnable Multimodal In-context Vectors directly injected into the residual streams of LVLMs. By analyzing the distinct roles of multi-head attention (MHA) and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) in the ICL process, we design a training strategy that enables M$^2$IV to perform fine-grained semantic distillation and robust cross-modal representation learning. M$^2$IV not only improves performance across diverse tasks and LVLMs but also significantly reduces token overhead, enabling graceful scaling to many-shot scenarios. To further enhance usability, we introduce \textbf{VLibrary}, a repository that stores trained M$^2$IVs for flexible retrieval and injection. With VLibrary, users can steer pre-trained LVLMs in a customized manner that meets diverse requirements. Extensive experiments demonstrate that M$^2$IV consistently outperforms vanilla ICL and prior representation engineering baselines, achieving an average accuracy gain of 3.74\% with substantial improvements in overall efficiency.

Yanshu Li, Yi Cao, Hongyang He, Qisen Cheng, Xiang Fu, Xi Xiao, Tianyang Wang, Ruixiang Tang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Sentiment AnalysisSST-5 (test)
Accuracy31.6
189
Sentiment ClassificationMR (test)
Accuracy74
154
Question ClassificationTREC (test)
Accuracy81.5
150
Topic ClassificationAG News (test)
Accuracy86.4
128
Commonsense ReasoningCSQA (test)
Accuracy81.8
123
Physical Commonsense ReasoningPIQA (test)
Accuracy82.5
71
Paraphrase DetectionMRPC
Accuracy71
68
Causal ReasoningCOPA
Accuracy93.5
63
Commonsense Fact VerificationCREAK (test)
Accuracy74.6
17
Generalization Performance AnalysisID and OOD Evaluation Suite Combined
Average Accuracy76.2
12
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update