Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

TreePO: Bridging the Gap of Policy Optimization and Efficacy and Inference Efficiency with Heuristic Tree-based Modeling

About

Recent advancements in aligning large language models via reinforcement learning have achieved remarkable gains in solving complex reasoning problems, but at the cost of expensive on-policy rollouts and limited exploration of diverse reasoning paths. In this work, we introduce TreePO, involving a self-guided rollout algorithm that views sequence generation as a tree-structured searching process. Composed of dynamic tree sampling policy and fixed-length segment decoding, TreePO leverages local uncertainty to warrant additional branches. By amortizing computation across common prefixes and pruning low-value paths early, TreePO essentially reduces the per-update compute burden while preserving or enhancing exploration diversity. Key contributions include: (1) a segment-wise sampling algorithm that alleviates the KV cache burden through contiguous segments and spawns new branches along with an early-stop mechanism; (2) a tree-based segment-level advantage estimation that considers both global and local proximal policy optimization. and (3) analysis on the effectiveness of probability and quality-driven dynamic divergence and fallback strategy. We empirically validate the performance gain of TreePO on a set reasoning benchmarks and the efficiency saving of GPU hours from 22\% up to 43\% of the sampling design for the trained models, meanwhile showing up to 40\% reduction at trajectory-level and 35\% at token-level sampling compute for the existing models. While offering a free lunch of inference efficiency, TreePO reveals a practical path toward scaling RL-based post-training with fewer samples and less compute. Home page locates at https://m-a-p.ai/TreePO.

Yizhi Li, Qingshui Gu, Zhoufutu Wen, Ziniu Li, Tianshun Xing, Shuyue Guo, Tianyu Zheng, Xin Zhou, Xingwei Qu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Zheng Zhang, Wei Shen, Qian Liu, Chenghua Lin, Jian Yang, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024 (test)--
209
Math ReasoningMATH
Accuracy84.65
160
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025 (test)
Pass@1 Rate5.1
148
Multi-Turn Medical DialogueMedMCQA
Accuracy54.74
32
Multi-Turn Medical DialogueMedicalExam
Accuracy65.33
32
Multi-Turn Medical DialogueMedQA
Accuracy61.81
32
MathematicsAIME 24
Avg@320.175
20
MathematicsAIME 25
Avg@3214.7
20
MathematicsMATH 500
Accuracy (avg@32)82.2
16
MathematicsAMC 23
Avg@32 Accuracy55.8
16
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update