Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

DLLMQuant: Quantizing Diffusion-based Large Language Models

About

Diffusion-based large language models (DLLMs) have shown promise for non-autoregressive text generation, but their deployment is constrained by large model sizes and heavy computational costs. Post-training quantization (PTQ), a widely used method for compressing and accelerating Large Language Models (LLMs), suffers from severe accuracy degradation and reduced generalization performance when directly applied to DLLMs (e.g., AWQ suffers a 16% accuracy drop on LLADA under W4A4). This paper explores how DLLMs' key mechanisms - dynamic masking, iterative generation, bidirectional attention - clash with quantization. We identify three core issues: 1) Iterative generation and dynamic masking ratios lead to distinct token distributions across decoding steps, which are not adequately captured by existing PTQ calibration methods; 2) Quantization errors are accumulated and amplified progressively during iteration in DLLMs, causing quantized models to perform worse as decoding steps progress; 3) Unmasked tokens stabilize while masked remain probabilistic, making overall feature distribution incompatible with existing PTQ methods. To address these issues, we propose DLLMQuant, a PTQ framework tailored for DLLMs, which incorporates three novel techniques: 1) Temporal-Mask Adaptive Sampling (TMAS), a calibration method that accounts for both time and mask factors, with the capacity to capture distributions across timesteps. 2) Interaction-Aware Activation Quantization (IA-AQ), which utilizes bidirectional attention's interaction signals to dynamically allocate quantization resources. 3) Certainty-Guided Quantization (CGQ), which integrates mask status and token scores as key weighting criteria into error compensation, making weight quantization more suitable for DLLMs. Experiments show that DLLMQuant achieves significant performance gains while enhancing efficiency.

Chen Xu, Dawei Yang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Commonsense ReasoningWinoGrande
Accuracy71.85
1581
Question AnsweringPIQA
Accuracy73.94
589
Sentence CompletionHellaSwag
Accuracy70.14
440
Code GenerationHumanEval
pass@144.58
329
Language UnderstandingCEval
Accuracy61.28
67
Question AnsweringARC
Accuracy84.18
45
Language Model EvaluationAggregate
Average Score64.31
21
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update