Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Refusal Tokens: A Simple Way to Calibrate Refusals in Large Language Models

About

A key component of building safe and reliable language models is enabling the models to appropriately refuse to follow certain instructions or answer certain questions. We may want models to output refusal messages for various categories of user queries, for example, ill-posed questions, instructions for committing illegal acts, or queries which require information past the model's knowledge horizon. Engineering models that refuse to answer such questions is complicated by the fact that an individual may want their model to exhibit varying levels of sensitivity for refusing queries of various categories, and different users may want different refusal rates. The current default approach involves training multiple models with varying proportions of refusal messages from each category to achieve the desired refusal rates, which is computationally expensive and may require training a new model to accommodate each user's desired preference over refusal rates. To address these challenges, we propose refusal tokens, one such token for each refusal category or a single refusal token, which are prepended to the model's responses during training. We then show how to increase or decrease the probability of generating the refusal token for each category during inference to steer the model's refusal behavior. Refusal tokens enable controlling a single model's refusal rates without the need of any further fine-tuning, but only by selectively intervening during generation.

Neel Jain, Aditya Shrivastava, Chenyang Zhu, Daben Liu, Alfy Samuel, Ashwinee Panda, Anoop Kumar, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Over-refusalWildjailbreak (Benign)
Wildjailbreak Benign Refusal Rate4.76
49
Safety RefusalAdvBench
Refusal Rate94.23
46
Overrefusal evaluationOrBench-H
RR23.88
21
Refusal EvaluationCoCoNot Orig
Refusal Rate94.01
7
Refusal EvaluationXSTest Unsafe
Refusal Rate94.5
7
Refusal EvaluationDo-Not-Answer
Refusal Rate87.01
7
Over-refusal evaluationWildGuard Unharmful
Over-refusal Rate9.52
7
Refusal ControlSORRY-Bench
Refusal Rate84.77
7
Refusal EvaluationHARMFULQA
Refusal Rate66.07
7
Over-refusal evaluationCoCoNot Contrast
Over-refusal Rate11.87
7
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update