Refusal Tokens: A Simple Way to Calibrate Refusals in Large Language Models
About
A key component of building safe and reliable language models is enabling the models to appropriately refuse to follow certain instructions or answer certain questions. We may want models to output refusal messages for various categories of user queries, for example, ill-posed questions, instructions for committing illegal acts, or queries which require information past the model's knowledge horizon. Engineering models that refuse to answer such questions is complicated by the fact that an individual may want their model to exhibit varying levels of sensitivity for refusing queries of various categories, and different users may want different refusal rates. The current default approach involves training multiple models with varying proportions of refusal messages from each category to achieve the desired refusal rates, which is computationally expensive and may require training a new model to accommodate each user's desired preference over refusal rates. To address these challenges, we propose refusal tokens, one such token for each refusal category or a single refusal token, which are prepended to the model's responses during training. We then show how to increase or decrease the probability of generating the refusal token for each category during inference to steer the model's refusal behavior. Refusal tokens enable controlling a single model's refusal rates without the need of any further fine-tuning, but only by selectively intervening during generation.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over-refusal | Wildjailbreak (Benign) | Wildjailbreak Benign Refusal Rate4.76 | 49 | |
| Safety Refusal | AdvBench | Refusal Rate94.23 | 46 | |
| Overrefusal evaluation | OrBench-H | RR23.88 | 21 | |
| Refusal Evaluation | CoCoNot Orig | Refusal Rate94.01 | 7 | |
| Refusal Evaluation | XSTest Unsafe | Refusal Rate94.5 | 7 | |
| Refusal Evaluation | Do-Not-Answer | Refusal Rate87.01 | 7 | |
| Over-refusal evaluation | WildGuard Unharmful | Over-refusal Rate9.52 | 7 | |
| Refusal Control | SORRY-Bench | Refusal Rate84.77 | 7 | |
| Refusal Evaluation | HARMFULQA | Refusal Rate66.07 | 7 | |
| Over-refusal evaluation | CoCoNot Contrast | Over-refusal Rate11.87 | 7 |