Transition Models: Rethinking the Generative Learning Objective
About
A fundamental dilemma in generative modeling persists: iterative diffusion models achieve outstanding fidelity, but at a significant computational cost, while efficient few-step alternatives are constrained by a hard quality ceiling. This conflict between generation steps and output quality arises from restrictive training objectives that focus exclusively on either infinitesimal dynamics (PF-ODEs) or direct endpoint prediction. We address this challenge by introducing an exact, continuous-time dynamics equation that analytically defines state transitions across any finite time interval. This leads to a novel generative paradigm, Transition Models (TiM), which adapt to arbitrary-step transitions, seamlessly traversing the generative trajectory from single leaps to fine-grained refinement with more steps. Despite having only 865M parameters, TiM achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing leading models such as SD3.5 (8B parameters) and FLUX.1 (12B parameters) across all evaluated step counts. Importantly, unlike previous few-step generators, TiM demonstrates monotonic quality improvement as the sampling budget increases. Additionally, when employing our native-resolution strategy, TiM delivers exceptional fidelity at resolutions up to 4096x4096.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (val) | FID7.11 | 307 | |
| Class-conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (val) | FID3.26 | 293 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 | FID3.61 | 243 | |
| Class-conditional generation | ImageNet 256 x 256 1k (val) | FID3.26 | 67 | |
| Text-to-Image Generation | GenEval 1.0 (test) | Overall Score77.97 | 63 | |
| Conditional Image Generation | ImageNet 256px 2012 (val) | FID3.26 | 50 | |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 256x256 (test) | FID3.26 | 46 |