SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learning
About
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for robotic manipulation. Despite substantial progress enabled by large-scale pretraining and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), these models face two fundamental challenges: (i) the scarcity and high cost of large-scale human-operated robotic trajectories required for SFT scaling, and (ii) limited generalization to tasks involving distribution shift. Recent breakthroughs in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate that reinforcement learning (RL) can dramatically enhance step-by-step reasoning capabilities, raising a natural question: Can RL similarly improve the long-horizon step-by-step action planning of VLA? In this work, we introduce SimpleVLA-RL, an efficient RL framework tailored for VLA models. Building upon veRL, we introduce VLA-specific trajectory sampling, scalable parallelization, multi-environment rendering, and optimized loss computation. When applied to OpenVLA-OFT, SimpleVLA-RL achieves SoTA performance on LIBERO and even outperforms $\pi_0$ on RoboTwin 1.0\&2.0 with the exploration-enhancing strategies we introduce. SimpleVLA-RL not only reduces dependence on large-scale data and enables robust generalization, but also remarkably surpasses SFT in real-world tasks. Moreover, we identify a novel phenomenon ``pushcut'' during RL training, wherein the policy discovers previously unseen patterns beyond those seen in the previous training process. Github: https://github.com/PRIME-RL/SimpleVLA-RL
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO | Object Achievement99.8 | 957 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO | Spatial Success Rate94.2 | 527 | |
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO (test) | Average Success Rate91.2 | 220 | |
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO | Spatial Success Rate91 | 116 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO Long | Success Rate91.7 | 91 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO Spatial Object Goal Long | Overall Success Rate (Long)87.7 | 82 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RoboTwin 2.0 (test) | Average Success Rate74 | 30 | |
| Dual-arm manipulation | RoboTwin Medium Horizon Tasks 150-230 Steps 2.0 | Move Can Pot61.2 | 20 | |
| Dual-arm manipulation | RoboTwin Long & Extra Long Horizon Tasks 280-650 Steps 2.0 | Handover Block57.8 | 20 | |
| Dual-arm manipulation | RoboTwin Short Horizon Tasks 100-130 Steps 2.0 | Lift Pot Success Rate64.1 | 20 |