Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learning

About

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for robotic manipulation. Despite substantial progress enabled by large-scale pretraining and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), these models face two fundamental challenges: (i) the scarcity and high cost of large-scale human-operated robotic trajectories required for SFT scaling, and (ii) limited generalization to tasks involving distribution shift. Recent breakthroughs in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate that reinforcement learning (RL) can dramatically enhance step-by-step reasoning capabilities, raising a natural question: Can RL similarly improve the long-horizon step-by-step action planning of VLA? In this work, we introduce SimpleVLA-RL, an efficient RL framework tailored for VLA models. Building upon veRL, we introduce VLA-specific trajectory sampling, scalable parallelization, multi-environment rendering, and optimized loss computation. When applied to OpenVLA-OFT, SimpleVLA-RL achieves SoTA performance on LIBERO and even outperforms $\pi_0$ on RoboTwin 1.0\&2.0 with the exploration-enhancing strategies we introduce. SimpleVLA-RL not only reduces dependence on large-scale data and enables robust generalization, but also remarkably surpasses SFT in real-world tasks. Moreover, we identify a novel phenomenon ``pushcut'' during RL training, wherein the policy discovers previously unseen patterns beyond those seen in the previous training process. Github: https://github.com/PRIME-RL/SimpleVLA-RL

Haozhan Li, Yuxin Zuo, Jiale Yu, Yuhao Zhang, Zhaohui Yang, Kaiyan Zhang, Xuekai Zhu, Yuchen Zhang, Tianxing Chen, Ganqu Cui, Dehui Wang, Dingxiang Luo, Yuchen Fan, Youbang Sun, Jia Zeng, Jiangmiao Pang, Shanghang Zhang, Yu Wang, Yao Mu, Bowen Zhou, Ning Ding• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Object Achievement99.8
957
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate94.2
527
Robot ManipulationLIBERO (test)
Average Success Rate91.2
220
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate91
116
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Long
Success Rate91.7
91
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Spatial Object Goal Long
Overall Success Rate (Long)87.7
82
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0 (test)
Average Success Rate74
30
Dual-arm manipulationRoboTwin Medium Horizon Tasks 150-230 Steps 2.0
Move Can Pot61.2
20
Dual-arm manipulationRoboTwin Long & Extra Long Horizon Tasks 280-650 Steps 2.0
Handover Block57.8
20
Dual-arm manipulationRoboTwin Short Horizon Tasks 100-130 Steps 2.0
Lift Pot Success Rate64.1
20
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update