Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Self-Supervised Goal-Reaching Results in Multi-Agent Cooperation and Exploration

About

For groups of autonomous agents to achieve a particular goal, they must engage in coordination and long-horizon reasoning. Rather than relying on complex reward functions and explicit cooperation mechanisms, we ask what minimal ingredients are required for effective coordination and exploration to emerge in multi-agent settings. We investigate this question through self-supervised goal-reaching, where agents aim to maximize the likelihood of visiting a goal state rather than maximizing a reward. Despite a sparse feedback signal, we present empirical results that show self-supervised goal-reaching techniques enable agents to learn from such feedback. On MARL benchmarks, self-supervised goal-reaching outperforms alternative approaches that have access to the same sparse reward signal. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that multi-agent self-supervised goal-reaching approaches can be more robust than single-agent strategies. While there is no explicit exploration mechanism, this approach explores nontrivial intermediate coordination strategies in sparse settings where alternative approaches fail to achieve a single success.

Chirayu Nimonkar, Shlok Shah, Catherine Ji, Benjamin Eysenbach• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multi-agent cooperationSimple_Tag 6 agents
Average Reward1.63e+4
44
2s3zStarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge Smax
Mean Win Rate95
5
3mStarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge Smax
Mean Win Rate94
3
3s_v_5zStarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge Smax
Mean Win Rate95
3
6h_v_8zStarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge Smax
Mean Win Rate100
3
8mStarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge Smax
Mean Win Rate84
3
AntMulti-Agent Control
Mean Success Rate270.6
3
HumanoidMulti-Agent Control
Mean Success Rate3.38
3
Half-CheetahMulti-Agent Control
Mean Success Rate901.6
3
3 AgentsMPE Tag
Mean Episode Return4.70e+3
2
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update