Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

MolmoAct: Action Reasoning Models that can Reason in Space

About

Reasoning is central to purposeful action, yet most robotic foundation models map perception and instructions directly to control, which limits adaptability, generalization, and semantic grounding. We introduce Action Reasoning Models (ARMs), a class of robotic foundation models that integrate perception, planning, and control through a structured three-stage pipeline. Our model, MolmoAct, encodes observations and instructions into depth-aware perception tokens, generates mid-level spatial plans as editable trajectory traces, and predicts precise low-level actions, enabling explainable and steerable behavior. MolmoAct-7B-D achieves strong performance across simulation and real-world settings: 70.5% zero-shot accuracy on SimplerEnv Visual Matching tasks, surpassing closed-source Pi-0 and GR00T N1.5; 86.6% average success on LIBERO, including an additional 6.3% gain over ThinkAct on long-horizon tasks; and in real-world fine-tuning, an additional 10% (single-arm) and an additional 22.7% (bimanual) task progression over Pi-0-FAST. It also outperforms baselines by an additional 23.3% on out-of-distribution generalization and achieves top human-preference scores for open-ended instruction following and trajectory steering. Furthermore, we release, for the first time, the MolmoAct Dataset -- a mid-training robot dataset comprising over 10,000 high quality robot trajectories across diverse scenarios and tasks. Training with this dataset yields an average 5.5% improvement in general performance over the base model. We release all model weights, training code, our collected dataset, and our action reasoning dataset, establishing MolmoAct as both a state-of-the-art robotics foundation model and an open blueprint for building ARMs that transform perception into purposeful action through structured reasoning. Blogpost: https://allenai.org/blog/molmoact

Jason Lee, Jiafei Duan, Haoquan Fang, Yuquan Deng, Shuo Liu, Boyang Li, Bohan Fang, Jieyu Zhang, Yi Ru Wang, Sangho Lee, Winson Han, Wilbert Pumacay, Angelica Wu, Rose Hendrix, Karen Farley, Eli VanderBilt, Ali Farhadi, Dieter Fox, Ranjay Krishna• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy86.6
935
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Goal Achievement87.6
494
Visual Question AnsweringAI2D
Accuracy72
174
Robot ManipulationLIBERO (test)
Average Success Rate86.6
142
Robot ManipulationSimplerEnv Google Robot Visual Matching
Pick Coke Can77.7
28
Robotic ManipulationSimplerEnv Google Robot - Visual Aggregation
Pick Coke Can76.1
28
Multi-task LearningLIBERO
Object Score95.4
18
Vision-Language UnderstandingMMBench
Accuracy80.1
14
Scientific Question AnsweringSciQA
Accuracy91.1
13
Embodied ReasoningERQA
Accuracy33.5
6
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update