Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning

About

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs, increasing computational overhead. Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection, which fails to remove redundant content thoroughly. To address these limitations, this work begins by framing two key patterns of redundant reflection in LRMs--Confidence Deficit, wherein the model reflects on correct intermediate steps, and Termination Delay, where reflection continues after a verified, confident answer--through a confidence-guided perspective. Based on this, we introduce ConCISE (Confidence-guided Compression In Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning), a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating Confidence Injection to boost reasoning confidence, and Early Stopping to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient. Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to baseline methods, fine-tuning LRMs on ConCISE-generated data yields a better balance between compression and task performance, reducing length by up to approximately 50% under SimPO, while maintaining high task accuracy.

Ziqing Qiao, Yongheng Deng, Jiali Zeng, Dong Wang, Lai Wei, Guanbo Wang, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Ju Ren, Yaoxue Zhang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024 (test)
Accuracy74.4
294
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy92.3
192
Mathematical ReasoningMATH500
Accuracy91
28
Mathematical ReasoningMATH500
Accuracy (ACC)91
20
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24
Accuracy (ACC)48.3
18
Scientific ReasoningGPQA (test)
Accuracy0.586
15
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24
Accuracy48.5
12
Entity GuessingText Pictionary
Success Rate (SR)80
10
Multi-agent DebateMMLU-Pro Debate
Success Rate (SR)65.7
10
Meeting SchedulingMeeting Scheduling
Success Rate (SR)43.7
10
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update