Do Modern Video-LLMs Need to Listen? A Benchmark Audit and Scalable Remedy
About
Speech and audio encoders developed over years of community effort are routinely excluded from video understanding pipelines, not because they fail, but because benchmarks never required listening. We audit 10 video benchmarks and find items largely solvable from visual cues alone: a single-frame probe answers about 76% of AVQA without audio, suggesting poor measurement of audio-visual reasoning. Building on LLaVA-OneVision, we attach a speech/audio encoder and compare five compressor architectures under 25-fold token reduction (25 Hz to 1 Hz). Across 10 benchmarks, with and without filtering, audio yields clear gains on tasks requiring speech comprehension or cross-modal grounding, while vision-centric suites remain largely unaffected. Our results show that speech encoders play a larger role in video understanding than current benchmarks suggest. We will open-source our work at https://github.com/naver-ai/unimambamia-av.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal Video Understanding | TempCompass | -- | 160 | |
| Video Question Answering | ActivityNet | -- | 32 | |
| Video Multimodal Evaluation | Video-MME | -- | 18 | |
| Audio-Visual Question Answering | MUSIC-AVQA | Original Score79.5 | 6 | |
| Audio-Visual Speaker Identification | AV-Speaker | Original Score46.6 | 6 | |
| Video Grounded Reasoning | WorldSense | Original Score44.7 | 6 | |
| Long-form Video Understanding | LongVideoBench | Original Score53.9 | 6 | |
| Multimodal Video Understanding | MMMU Video | Original Score36.7 | 6 |