Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

OptMerge: Unifying Multimodal LLM Capabilities and Modalities via Model Merging

About

Foundation models update slowly due to resource-intensive training, whereas domain-specific models evolve rapidly between releases. Model merging seeks to combine multiple expert models into a single, more capable model, reducing storage and serving costs while supporting decentralized development. Despite its potential, previous studies have primarily focused on merging visual classification models or Large Language Models (LLMs) for code and math tasks. Recently, Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) that extend LLMs through large-scale multimodal training have gained traction. However, there lacks a benchmark for model merging research that clearly divides the tasks for MLLM training and evaluation. In this paper, $\textbf{(i)}$ we introduce a model merging benchmark for MLLMs, which includes multiple tasks such as VQA, Geometry, Chart, OCR, and Grounding, studying both LoRA and full fine-tuning models. Moreover, we explore how model merging can combine different modalities (e.g., vision-language, audio-language, and video-language models), moving toward the Omni-language model. $\textbf{(ii)}$ We implement 10 model merging algorithms on the benchmark. Furthermore, we propose a novel method that removes noise from task vectors and robustly optimizes the merged vector based on a loss defined over task vector interactions, achieving an average performance gain of 2.48%. $\textbf{(iii)}$ We find that model merging offers a promising way for building improved MLLMs without requiring training data. Our results also demonstrate that the complementarity among multiple modalities outperforms individual modalities.

Yongxian Wei, Runxi Cheng, Weike Jin, Enneng Yang, Li Shen, Lu Hou, Sinan Du, Chun Yuan, Xiaochun Cao, Dacheng Tao• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy43.76
1863
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA--
916
Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
Score46.9
566
Diagram Question AnsweringAI2D
AI2D Accuracy79.44
509
Document Visual Question AnsweringDocVQA
ANLS84.18
301
Visual Question AnsweringGQA (test)
Accuracy61.29
204
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy30.85
193
Visual GroundingRefCOCOg (test)
Accuracy84.68
160
Mathematical ReasoningMathVista mini
Accuracy80.01
151
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz (test)
Accuracy43.52
136
Showing 10 of 56 rows

Other info

Follow for update