Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Fractal Graph Contrastive Learning

About

Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) relies on semantically consistent graph augmentations, but common local perturbations provide limited control over global structural consistency, motivating a more principled global augmentation strategy. We therefore propose Fractal Graph Contrastive Learning (FractalGCL), a theory-motivated framework that constructs a renormalisation-based augmented graph and introduces a fractal-dimension-aware contrastive loss that penalises unreliable positive views and reweights negative-pair repulsion by finite-scale box-counting discrepancies. However, computing these discrepancies introduces substantial overhead, so we derive and justify a Gaussian surrogate that avoids repeated box-counting on renormalised graphs, yielding about a $61\%$ runtime reduction. Experiments show that FractalGCL serves as an effective frozen-pretraining tool on MalNet-Tiny, achieves strong performance on the standard TUDataset benchmarks, and outperforms the next-best method on real-world urban traffic tasks by $4.51$ percentage points in average accuracy. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FractalGCL-0511/.

Nero Z. Li, Xuehao Zhai, Zhichao Shi, Boshen Shi, Xuhui Jiang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy75.85
1252
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy91.71
1103
Graph ClassificationNCI1
Accuracy80.5
658
Graph ClassificationD&D
Accuracy80.14
146
Graph ClassificationREDDIT-M5K
Accuracy0.5645
24
Graph ClassificationMalNet Tiny
Accuracy93.4
21
Graph ClassificationUrban road-network subgraphs Chicago, San Francisco, New York (averaged over all cities and tasks)
Accuracy61.76
6
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update