Train Once, Reuse Everywhere: Generalizable Implicit In-Context Learning by Routing Attention
About
Implicit in-context learning (ICL) has newly emerged as a promising paradigm that simulates ICL behaviors in the representation space of large language models (LLMs), aiming to attain few-shot performance at zero-shot cost. However, existing approaches largely rely on injecting shift vectors into residual flows, which are typically constructed from labeled demonstrations or task-specific alignment. Such designs fall short of utilizing the structural mechanisms underlying ICL and suffer from limited generalizability. To address this, we propose In-Context Routing (ICR), a novel implicit ICL method that captures and utilizes generalizable ICL patterns at the attention logits level. It extracts reusable structural directions that emerge during ICL and employs a learnable input-conditioned router to modulate attention logits accordingly, enabling an efficient train-once-and-reuse framework. We evaluate ICR on 12 real-world datasets spanning diverse domains and multiple LLMs. The results show that ICR consistently outperforms existing implicit ICL methods that require task-specific retrieval or training, while demonstrating robust generalization to out-of-domain tasks where they struggle. These findings position ICR to push the boundary of the practical value of ICL. The code is available at https://github.com/Lijiaqian1/In-Context-Routing.git.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question Answering | PIQA | Accuracy82.6 | 589 | |
| Physical Interaction Question Answering | PIQA | Accuracy57 | 462 | |
| Question Classification | TREC | Accuracy82.2 | 274 | |
| Sentiment Analysis | SST-5 (test) | Accuracy41.4 | 189 | |
| Sentiment Analysis | SST-2 | Accuracy93.8 | 175 | |
| Sentiment Classification | MR (test) | Accuracy89.4 | 154 | |
| Question Classification | TREC (test) | Accuracy83.8 | 150 | |
| Topic Classification | AG News (test) | Accuracy86.6 | 128 | |
| Commonsense Reasoning | CSQA (test) | Accuracy82 | 123 | |
| Physical Commonsense Reasoning | PIQA (test) | Accuracy82.6 | 71 |