Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Balancing Multimodal Training Through Game-Theoretic Regularization

About

Multimodal learning holds promise for richer information extraction by capturing dependencies across data sources. Yet, current training methods often underperform due to modality competition, a phenomenon where modalities contend for training resources leaving some underoptimized. This raises a pivotal question: how can we address training imbalances, ensure adequate optimization across all modalities, and achieve consistent performance improvements as we transition from unimodal to multimodal data? This paper proposes the Multimodal Competition Regularizer (MCR), inspired by a mutual information (MI) decomposition designed to prevent the adverse effects of competition in multimodal training. Our key contributions are: 1) A game-theoretic framework that adaptively balances modality contributions by encouraging each to maximize its informative role in the final prediction 2) Refining lower and upper bounds for each MI term to enhance the extraction of both task-relevant unique and shared information across modalities. 3) Proposing latent space permutations for conditional MI estimation, significantly improving computational efficiency. MCR outperforms all previously suggested training strategies and simple baseline, clearly demonstrating that training modalities jointly leads to important performance gains on both synthetic and large real-world datasets. We release our code and models at https://github.com/kkontras/MCR.

Konstantinos Kontras, Thomas Strypsteen, Christos Chatzichristos, Paul Pu Liang, Matthew Blaschko, Maarten De Vos• 2024

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multimodal Action RecognitionUCF101
Accuracy82.81
23
Multimodal Action RecognitionKinetic-Sounds (KS)
Accuracy (ACC)86.41
14
Multimodal Emotion RecognitionCREMA-D
Accuracy76.34
14
Sentiment AnalysisCMU-MOSEI
ACC80.77
13
Multimodal Action RecognitionKinetic-Sounds ViT
Accuracy69.51
13
Multi-modal ClassificationMUSTARD (test)
Accuracy60.3
12
Irony RecognitionCREMA-D alpha=0.1 synthetic irony class (3-fold cross-val)
Total F163.7
9
Irony RecognitionCREMA-D synthetic irony class alpha=0.5 (3-fold cross-validation)
Total F1 Score60.8
9
Irony RecognitionCREMA-D alpha=2.0 synthetic irony class 3-fold (val)
Total F1 Score55.5
9
Irony RecognitionCREMA-D alpha=1.0 synthetic irony class (3-fold cross-validation)
Total F159.6
9
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update