CogVLA: Cognition-Aligned Vision-Language-Action Model via Instruction-Driven Routing & Sparsification
About
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models built on pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) require extensive post-training, resulting in high computational overhead that limits scalability and deployment.We propose CogVLA, a Cognition-Aligned Vision-Language-Action framework that leverages instruction-driven routing and sparsification to improve both efficiency and performance. CogVLA draws inspiration from human multimodal coordination and introduces a 3-stage progressive architecture. 1) Encoder-FiLM based Aggregation Routing (EFA-Routing) injects instruction information into the vision encoder to selectively aggregate and compress dual-stream visual tokens, forming a instruction-aware latent representation. 2) Building upon this compact visual encoding, LLM-FiLM based Pruning Routing (LFP-Routing) introduces action intent into the language model by pruning instruction-irrelevant visually grounded tokens, thereby achieving token-level sparsity. 3) To ensure that compressed perception inputs can still support accurate and coherent action generation, we introduce V-L-A Coupled Attention (CAtten), which combines causal vision-language attention with bidirectional action parallel decoding. Extensive experiments on the LIBERO benchmark and real-world robotic tasks demonstrate that CogVLA achieves state-of-the-art performance with success rates of 97.4% and 70.0%, respectively, while reducing training costs by 2.5-fold and decreasing inference latency by 2.8-fold compared to OpenVLA. CogVLA is open-sourced and publicly available at https://github.com/JiuTian-VL/CogVLA.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO | Object Achievement98.8 | 1025 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO | Spatial Success Rate98.6 | 570 | |
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO (test) | Average Success Rate97 | 237 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO | Long-horizon Success Rate95.2 | 165 | |
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO simulation | Average Success Rate97.4 | 83 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO | Spatial Success Rate98.6 | 29 | |
| Robot Policy Learning | LIBERO standard 4-suite protocol | Spatial Achievement Rate98.6 | 10 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | LIBERO 40 (fine-tuning) | Spatial Success Rate98.6 | 9 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | CSOT-Bench Ours (fine-tuning) | Scene Success Rate81.2 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Cobot Agilex ALOHA real-world | Object Placement (Cube->Plate) SR90 | 6 |