Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

BroRL: Scaling Reinforcement Learning via Broadened Exploration

About

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a key ingredient for unlocking complex reasoning capabilities in large language models. Recent work ProRL has shown promise in scaling RL by increasing the number of training steps. However, performance plateaus after thousands of steps, with clear diminishing returns from allocating more computation to additional training. In this work, we investigate a complementary paradigm for scaling RL, BroR-Lincreasing the number of rollouts per example to hundreds to exhaustively Broaden exploration, which yields continuous performance gains beyond the saturation point observed in ProRL when scaling the number of training steps. Our approach is motivated by a mass balance equation analysis allowing us to characterize the rate of change in probability mass for correct and incorrect tokens during the reinforcement process. We show that under a one-step RL assumption, sampled rollout tokens always contribute to correct-mass expansion, while unsampled tokens outside rollouts may lead to gains or losses depending on their distribution and the net reward balance. Importantly, as the number of rollouts per example N increases, the effect of unsampled terms diminishes, ensuring overall correct-mass expansion. To validate our theoretical analysis, we conduct simulations under more relaxed conditions and find that a sufficiently large rollout size N-corresponding to ample exploration-guarantees an increase in the probability mass of all correct tokens. Empirically, BroRL revives models saturated after 3K ProRL training steps and demonstrates robust, continuous improvement, achieving state-of-the-art results for the 1.5B model across diverse benchmarks.

Jian Hu, Mingjie Liu, Ximing Lu, Fang Wu, Zaid Harchaoui, Shizhe Diao, Yejin Choi, Pavlo Molchanov, Jun Yang, Jan Kautz, Yi Dong• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy36.88
227
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy92.14
119
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiad Bench
Accuracy61.5
73
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy36.9
58
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva Math
Accuracy49.1
54
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva
Accuracy49.08
25
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Pass@1 Accuracy92.1
25
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy57.5
25
Mathematical ReasoningAMC 2023
Accuracy81
11
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update