Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

BrainIB++: Leveraging Graph Neural Networks and Information Bottleneck for Functional Brain Biomarkers in Schizophrenia

About

The development of diagnostic models is gaining traction in the field of psychiatric disorders. Recently, machine learning classifiers based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) have been developed to identify brain biomarkers that differentiate psychiatric disorders from healthy controls. However, conventional machine learning-based diagnostic models often depend on extensive feature engineering, which introduces bias through manual intervention. While deep learning models are expected to operate without manual involvement, their lack of interpretability poses significant challenges in obtaining explainable and reliable brain biomarkers to support diagnostic decisions, ultimately limiting their clinical applicability. In this study, we introduce an end-to-end innovative graph neural network framework named BrainIB++, which applies the information bottleneck (IB) principle to identify the most informative data-driven brain regions as subgraphs during model training for interpretation. We evaluate the performance of our model against nine established brain network classification methods across three multi-cohort schizophrenia datasets. It consistently demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy and exhibits generalizability to unseen data. Furthermore, the subgraphs identified by our model also correspond with established clinical biomarkers in schizophrenia, particularly emphasizing abnormalities in the visual, sensorimotor, and higher cognition brain functional network. This alignment enhances the model's interpretability and underscores its relevance for real-world diagnostic applications.

Tianzheng Hu, Qiang Li, Shu Liu, Vince D. Calhoun, Guido van Wingen, Shujian Yu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
MCI vs. AD classificationADNI
Accuracy77.19
13
Binary Diagnosis ClassificationADNI NC vs AD
Accuracy78.13
12
Binary Diagnosis ClassificationADNI NC vs MCI
Accuracy72.61
12
Diagnosis classificationABIDE
Accuracy70.63
12
Diagnosis classificationADHD-200
Accuracy70.73
12
3-class Diagnosis ClassificationADNI 3-class
Accuracy0.6429
12
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update