Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Dual-Uncertainty Guided Policy Learning for Multimodal Reasoning

About

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has advanced reasoning capabilities in multimodal large language models. However, existing methods typically treat visual inputs as deterministic, overlooking the perceptual ambiguity inherent to the visual modality. Consequently, they fail to distinguish whether a model's uncertainty stems from complex reasoning or ambiguous perception, preventing the targeted allocation of exploration or learning signals. To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{DUPL}, a dual-uncertainty guided policy learning approach for multimodal RLVR that quantifies and leverages both perceptual uncertainty (via symmetric KL divergence) and output uncertainty (via policy entropy) to guide policy updates. By establishing an uncertainty-driven feedback loop and employing a dynamic branch prioritization mechanism, DUPL recalibrates the policy advantage to focus learning on states with high perceptual or decisional ambiguity, enabling effective targeted exploration beyond passive data augmentation. Evaluated on diverse multimodal reasoning benchmarks spanning mathematical and general domains, DUPL achieves solid gains. It improves Qwen2.5-VL accuracy by up to $\textbf{12.3%}$ (3B) and $\textbf{7.9%}$ (7B), and Qwen3-VL-Instruct by up to $\textbf{10.7%}$ (4B) and $\textbf{12.4%}$ (8B), consistently outperforming GRPO, while seamlessly generalizing to alternative algorithms (DAPO, $\textbf{+6.5%}$ avg) and architectures (LLaVA-OneVision-1.5, $\textbf{+4.7%}$ avg). These results demonstrate that DUPL is an effective and generalizable approach for multimodal RLVR.

Rui Liu, Dian Yu, Tong Zheng, Runpeng Dai, Zongxia Li, Wenhao Yu, Zhenwen Liang, Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi, Pratap Tokekar, Dong Yu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningWeMath
Accuracy71.1
317
Mathematical ReasoningMathVerse
Accuracy52.1
266
Chart Question AnsweringChartQA (test)
Accuracy84.1
196
Logical reasoningLogicVista
Accuracy48.7
163
Chart Understanding and ReasoningChartQA
Accuracy84
143
Mathematical ReasoningMathVista
Accuracy74.2
37
Visual Math ReasoningMathVista (test)
MathVista Accuracy80
14
Comprehensive ReasoningAggregate Benchmarks
Average Accuracy66.9
13
General Domain ReasoningHalluBench
Accuracy71
13
Mathematical ReasoningWeMath (test)
Accuracy82.9
6
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update