Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

A Spatial-Spectral-Frequency Interactive Network for Multimodal Remote Sensing Classification

About

Deep learning-based methods have achieved significant success in remote sensing Earth observation data analysis. Numerous feature fusion techniques address multimodal remote sensing image classification by integrating global and local features. However, these techniques often struggle to extract structural and detail features from heterogeneous and redundant multimodal images. With the goal of introducing frequency domain learning to model key and sparse detail features, this paper introduces the spatial-spectral-frequency interaction network (S$^2$Fin), which integrates pairwise fusion modules across the spatial, spectral, and frequency domains. Specifically, we propose a high-frequency sparse enhancement transformer that employs sparse spatial-spectral attention to optimize the parameters of the high-frequency filter. Subsequently, a two-level spatial-frequency fusion strategy is introduced, comprising an adaptive frequency channel module that fuses low-frequency structures with enhanced high-frequency details, and a high-frequency resonance mask that emphasizes sharp edges via phase similarity. In addition, a spatial-spectral attention fusion module further enhances feature extraction at intermediate layers of the network. Experiments on four benchmark multimodal datasets with limited labeled data demonstrate that S$^2$Fin performs superior classification, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. The code is available at https://github.com/HaoLiu-XDU/SSFin.

Hao Liu, Yunhao Gao, Wei Li, Mingyang Zhang, Maoguo Gong, Lorenzo Bruzzone• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Remote Sensing Image ClassificationAugsburg
Parameters (M)0.63
20
Remote Sensing Image ClassificationYellow River Estuary
Params (M)0.7
20
Remote Sensing Image ClassificationLCZ HK
Params (M)0.65
20
Multimodal Remote Sensing ClassificationYellow River Estuary
Overall Accuracy (OA)67.54
12
ClassificationLCZ HK (test)
Overall Accuracy (OA)72.26
9
Hyperspectral Image ClassificationHouston 2013 (test)
Overall Accuracy (OA)89.19
9
Land Cover ClassificationAugsburg 10 train samples per class (test)
Overall Accuracy (OA)79.91
9
ClassificationYellow River Estuary (test)
Accuracy (Spartina Alterniflora)75.71
9
Image ClassificationHouston 2013
Parameters (M)0.7
8
Multimodal Remote Sensing ClassificationHouston 2013
Overall Accuracy89.19
2
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update