Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs

About

Recent work shows that, beyond discrete reasoning through explicit chain-of-thought steps, which are limited by the boundaries of natural languages, large language models (LLMs) can also reason continuously in latent space, allowing richer information per step and thereby improving token efficiency. Despite this promise, latent reasoning still faces two challenges, especially in training-free settings: 1) purely latent reasoning broadens the search distribution by maintaining multiple implicit paths, which diffuses probability mass, introduces noise, and impedes convergence to a single high-confidence solution, thereby hurting accuracy; and 2) overthinking persists even without explicit text, wasting tokens and degrading efficiency. To address these issues, we introduce SwiReasoning, a training-free framework for LLM reasoning which features two key innovations: 1) SwiReasoning dynamically switches between explicit and latent reasoning, guided by block-wise confidence estimated from entropy trends in next-token distributions, to balance exploration and exploitation and promote timely convergence. 2) By limiting the maximum number of thinking-block switches, SwiReasoning curbs overthinking and improves token efficiency across varying problem difficulties. On widely used mathematics, STEM, coding, and general benchmarks, SwiReasoning consistently improves average accuracy by 1.8%-3.1% across reasoning LLMs of different model families and scales. Furthermore, under constrained budgets, SwiReasoning improves average token efficiency by 57%-79%, with larger gains as budgets tighten.

Dachuan Shi, Abedelkadir Asi, Keying Li, Xiangchi Yuan, Leyan Pan, Wenke Lee, Wen Xiao• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMATH 500
Accuracy98.4
442
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy82.92
370
Science ReasoningGPQA
Accuracy45.96
243
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Pass@1 Accuracy82.92
165
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 24
Accuracy50
154
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Pass@1 Accuracy73.75
118
CodingHumanEval
Pass@195.73
103
Science ReasoningGPQA
Pass@170.2
50
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsenseQA
Accuracy (pass@1)85.34
45
Mathematical ReasoningGSM8K
Accuracy96.21
43
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update